Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37647640›Full record

ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2023

HAPNEST: efficient, large-scale generation and evaluation of synthetic datasets for genotypes and phenotypes.

Sophie Wharrie, Zhiyu Yang, Vishnu Raj, Remo Monti, Rahul Gupta, Ying Wang, Alicia Martin, Luke J O'Connor, Samuel Kaski, Pekka Marttinen and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Generating synthetic genotypes using diffusion models.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Synthetic data can aid the analysis of clinical outcomes: How much can it be trusted?Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. A resampling-based approach to share reference panels.Nature computational science · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Sophie WharrieDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-2593-8081
Zhiyu YangInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.
Vishnu RajDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
Remo MontiHasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Digital Engineering Faculty, Potsdam 14469, Germany.
Rahul GuptaBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.
Ying WangBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.
Alicia MartinBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0241-3522
Luke J O'ConnorBroad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, United States.
Samuel KaskiDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
Pekka MarttinenDepartment of Computer Science, Aalto University, Espoo 02150, Finland.
Pier Francesco PalamaraDepartment of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 2JD, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-7999-1972
Christoph LippertHasso Plattner Institute, University of Potsdam, Digital Engineering Faculty, Potsdam 14469, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6363-2556
Andrea GannaInstitute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki 00014, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

motivationExisting methods for simulating synthetic genotype and phenotype datasets have limited scalability, constraining their usability for large-scale analyses. Moreover, a systematic approach for evaluating synthetic data quality and a benchmark synthetic dataset for developing and evaluating methods for polygenic risk scores are lacking.

resultsWe present HAPNEST, a novel approach for efficiently generating diverse individual-level genotypic and phenotypic data. In comparison to alternative methods, HAPNEST shows faster computational speed and a lower degree of relatedness with reference panels, while generating datasets that preserve key statistical properties of real data. These desirable synthetic data properties enabled us to generate 6.8 million common variants and nine phenotypes with varying degrees of heritability and polygenicity across 1 million individuals. We demonstrate how HAPNEST can facilitate biobank-scale analyses through the comparison of seven methods to generate polygenic risk scoring across multiple ancestry groups and different genetic architectures. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: A synthetic dataset of 1 008 000 individuals and nine traits for 6.8 million common variants is available at https://www.ebi.ac.uk/biostudies/studies/S-BSST936. The HAPNEST software for generating synthetic datasets is available as Docker/Singularity containers and open source Julia and C code at https://github.com/intervene-EU-H2020/synthetic_data.

Indexed as

BenchmarkingData AccuracyGenotypeHumansMultifactorial InheritancePhenotype

Identifiers

PMID37647640
PMCPMC10493177

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.