Evidence mapPaperPMID 37649039Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2023

Low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin and survival in patients with breast cancers: a Norwegian population-based cohort study.

L Lukas Löfling, Nathalie C Støer, Bettina Kulle Andreassen, Giske Ursin, Edoardo Botteri

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Further considerations regarding the APHINITY statin analysis.Translational breast cancer research : a journal focusing on translational research in breast cancer · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

L Lukas LöflingDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Postboks 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2731-8532
Nathalie C StøerDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Postboks 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8994-9332
Bettina Kulle AndreassenDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Postboks 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5087-2913
Giske UrsinCancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0835-9507
Edoardo BotteriDepartment of Research, Cancer Registry of Norway, Postboks 5313 Majorstuen, 0304, Oslo, Norway. edoardo.botteri@kreftregisteret.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9023-8068
Posten (Norway) · NOCancer Registry of Norway · NOUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies assessed the prognostic effect of aspirin, statins, and metformin in breast cancer (BC) patients, with inconclusive results.

methodsWe performed a nationwide population-based cohort study to evaluate if post-diagnostic use of low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin was associated with BC-specific survival. Women aged ≥ 50 years and diagnosed with BC in 2004-2017, who survived ≥ 12 months after diagnosis (follow-up started 12 months after diagnosis), were identified in the Cancer Registry of Norway. The Norwegian Prescription Database provided information on prescriptions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between post-diagnostic use and BC-specific survival, overall and by oestrogen receptor (ER) status.

resultsA total of 26,190 patients were included. Of these, 5324 (20%), 7591 (29%), and 1495 (6%) were post-diagnostic users of low-dose aspirin, statins, and metformin, respectively. The median follow-up was 6.1 years, and 2169 (8%) patients died from BC. HRs for use, compared to no use, were estimated at 0.96 (95% CI 0.85-1.08) for low-dose aspirin (ER+: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.83-1.13; ER-: HR = 0.97, 95% CI 0.73-1.29, p value for interaction = 0.562), 0.84 (95% CI 0.75-0.94) for statins (ER+: HR = 0.95, 95% CI 0.82-1.09; ER-: HR = 0.77, 95% CI 0.60-1.00, p value for interaction = 0.259), and 0.70 (95% CI 0.51-0.96) for metformin (compared to use of non-metformin antidiabetics) (ER+: HR = 0.67, 95% CI 0.45-1.01; ER-: HR = 1.62, 95% CI 0.72-3.62, p value for interaction = 0.077).

conclusionWe found evidence supporting an association between post-diagnostic use of statins and metformin and survival, in patients with BC. Our findings indicate potential differences according to ER status.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMetforminAspirinCohort StudiesFemaleHumansNorwayReceptors, EstrogenAspirinHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsMetforminReceptors, EstrogenBreast cancerCohortLow-dose aspirinMetforminPopulation-basedStatinsSurvival

Identifiers

PMID37649039
PMCPMC10466817
OpenAlexW4386292932

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.