Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37653260›Full record

ArticleVirchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology2023

Minimally invasive autopsies for the investigation of pulmonary pathology of COVID-19-experiences of a longitudinal series of 92 patients.

Petar Noack, Claudia Grosse, Jacob Bodingbauer, Marion Almeder, Sylvia Lohfink-Schumm, Helmut J F Salzer, Jens Meier, Bernd Lamprecht, Clemens A Schmitt, Rupert Langer

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 72% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Petar Noack *Institute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Claudia Grosse *Institute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Jacob BodingbauerInstitute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Marion AlmederInstitute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Sylvia Lohfink-SchummInstitute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria.
Helmut J F SalzerMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Jens MeierMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Bernd LamprechtMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Clemens A SchmittMedical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria.
Rupert LangerInstitute of Clinical Pathology, Kepler University Hospital, Krankenhausstr. 9, 4021, Linz, Austria. rupert.langer@kepleruniklinikum.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9491-3609
Johannes Kepler University of Linz · ATKepler Universitätsklinikum · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive autopsies (MIAs) allow the collection of tissue samples for diagnostic and research purposes in special situations, e.g., when there is a high risk of infection which is the case in the context of COVID-19 or restrictions due to legal or personal reasons. We performed MIA to analyze lung tissue from 92 COVID-19 patients (mean age 78 years; range 48-98; 35 women, 57 men), representing 44% of all patients who died from the disease between October 2020 and April 2021. An intercostal approach was used with removal of a 5-cm rib section followed by manual collection of four lung tissue samples (5-8 cm in size). Diffuse alveolar damage (DAD) was found in 89 (97%) patients at various stages. Exudative DAD (eDAD) predominated in 18 (20%) patients, proliferative DAD (pDAD) in 43 (47%) patients, and mixed DAD (mDAD) in 31 (34%) patients. There were no significant differences in the predominant DAD pattern between tissue samples from the same patient. Additional purulent components were present in 46 (50%) cases. Fungi were detected in 11 (12%) patients. The pDAD pattern was associated with longer hospital stay including intensive care unit (p=0.026 and p<0.001) and younger age (p=0.019). Positive bronchoalveolar lavage and blood cultures were observed more frequently in pDAD patterns (p<0.001; p=0.018). In contrast, there was no significant association between intravital positive microbiological results and superimposed bronchopneumonia or fungal infection at autopsy. Having demonstrated the characteristic lung changes in a large longitudinal autopsy series, we conclude that the presented MIA approach can be considered a reliable and safe method for performing post mortem lung diagnostics in COVID-19 and other high-risk situations. The lack of correlation between histological changes indicative of bacterial or fungal superinfection and microbiology could have clinical implications for disease and treatment surveillance.

Indexed as

COVID-19AgedAutopsyFemaleHumansLungMaleCOVID-19Diffuse alveolar damageMinimally invasive autopsyPulmonary pathology

Identifiers

PMID37653260
PMCPMC10673967
OpenAlexW4386347209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.