ArticleHealth information science and systems2023
S-LSTM-ATT: a hybrid deep learning approach with optimized features for emotion recognition in electroencephalogram.
Article in Health information science and systems, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- PilotCareTrans Net: an EEG data-driven transformer for pilot health monitoring.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2025Article
- Enhanced performance of EEG-based brain-computer interfaces by joint sample and feature importance assessment.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- Adaptive filter of frequency bands based coordinate attention network for EEG-based motor imagery classification.Health information science and systems · 2024Article
- A comprehensive review of deep learning in EEG-based emotion recognition: classifications, trends, and practical implications.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Human emotion recognition using electroencephalograms (EEG) is a critical area of research in human-machine interfaces. Furthermore, EEG data are convoluted and diverse; thus, acquiring consistent results from these signals remains challenging. As such, the authors felt compelled to investigate EEG signals to identify different emotions. Methods: A novel deep learning (DL) model stacked long short-term memory with attention (S-LSTM-ATT) model is proposed for emotion recognition (ER) in EEG signals. Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and attention networks effectively handle time-series EEG data and recognise intrinsic connections and patterns. Therefore, the model combined the strengths of the LSTM model and incorporated an attention network to enhance its effectiveness. Optimal features were extracted from the metaheuristic-based firefly optimisation algorithm (FFOA) to identify different emotions efficiently. Results: The proposed approach recognised emotions in two publicly available standard datasets: SEED and EEG Brainwave. An outstanding accuracy of 97.83% in the SEED and 98.36% in the EEG Brainwave datasets were obtained for three emotion indices: positive, neutral and negative. Aside from accuracy, a comprehensive comparison of the proposed model's precision, recall, F1 score and kappa score was performed to determine the model's applicability. When applied to the SEED and EEG Brainwave datasets, the proposed S-LSTM-ATT achieved superior results to baseline models such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) and LSTM. Conclusion: Combining an FFOA-based feature selection (FS) and an S-LSTM-ATT-based classification model demonstrated promising results with high accuracy. Other metrics like precision, recall, F1 score and kappa score proved the suitability of the proposed model for ER in EEG signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.