Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37656983›Full record

Trial reportThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2024

Improvements in Sperm Motility Following Low- or High-Intensity Dietary Interventions in Men With Obesity.

Aditi Sharma, Nikoleta Papanikolaou, Sara Abou Sherif, Anastasia Dimakopolou, Thilipan Thaventhiran, Cara Go, Olivia Holtermann Entwistle, Adrian Brown, Rong Luo, Rama Jha and 12 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Gut-testis axis: how microbiota influence male reproductive health.Asian biomedicine : research, reviews and news · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Aditi SharmaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Nikoleta PapanikolaouDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0009-0005-2988-9696
Sara Abou SherifDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Anastasia DimakopolouDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Thilipan ThaventhiranDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Cara GoDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Olivia Holtermann EntwistleDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Adrian BrownCentre for Obesity Research, University College London, London, UK.
Rong LuoDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Rama JhaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Anavi PrakashDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Dalia KhalifaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Hannah LewisDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Sruthi RamarajuDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Anthony R LeedsClinical Research Unit, Parker Institute, Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Harvinder ChahalDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.
Sanjay PurkayasthaDepartment of General and Bariatric Surgery, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK.
Ralf HenkelDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1128-2982
Sukhbinder MinhasDepartment of Urology, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Charing Cross Hospital, Fulham Palace Road, Hammersmith, London, UK.
Gary FrostDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0529-6325
Waljit S DhilloDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5950-4316
Channa N JayasenaDepartment of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Imperial College, London W12 0NN, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2578-8223
Imperial College London · GBImperial College Healthcare NHS Trust · GBFrederiksberg Hospital · DKUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Imperial College Healthcare CharityLogixX Pharma, Theale, Berkshire, UKNational Institute of Health and Care ResearchNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreNIHR/Imperial Clinical Research FacilityNIHR Post-Doctoral Fellowship & Imperial BRC
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionObesity increases risks of male infertility, but bariatric surgery does not improve semen quality. Recent uncontrolled studies suggest that a low-energy diet (LED) improves semen quality. Further evaluation within a randomized, controlled setting is warranted.

methodsMen with obesity (18-60 years) with normal sperm concentration (normal count) (n = 24) or oligozoospermia (n = 43) were randomized 1:1 to either 800 kcal/day LED for 16 weeks or control, brief dietary intervention (BDI) with 16 weeks' observation. Semen parameters were compared at baseline and 16 weeks.

resultsMean age of men with normal count was 39.4 ± 6.4 in BDI and 40.2 ± 9.6 years in the LED group. Mean age of men with oligozoospermia was 39.5 ± 7.5 in BDI and 37.7 ± 6.6 years in the LED group. LED caused more weight loss than BDI in men with normal count (14.4 vs 6.3 kg; P < .001) and men with oligozoospermia (17.6 vs 1.8 kg; P < .001). Compared with baseline, in men with normal count total motility (TM) increased 48 ± 17% to 60 ± 10% (P < .05) after LED, and 52 ± 8% to 61 ± 6% (P < .0001) after BDI; progressive motility (PM) increased 41 ± 16% to 53 ± 10% (P < .05) after LED, and 45 ± 8% to 54 ± 65% (P < .001) after BDI. In men with oligozoospermia compared with baseline, TM increased 35% [26] to 52% [16] (P < .05) after LED, and 43% [28] to 50% [23] (P = .0587) after BDI; PM increased 29% [23] to 46% [18] (P < .05) after LED, and 33% [25] to 44% [25] (P < .05) after BDI. No differences in postintervention TM or PM were observed between LED and BDI groups in men with normal count or oligozoospermia.

conclusionLED or BDI may be sufficient to improve sperm motility in men with obesity. The effects of paternal dietary intervention on fertility outcomes requires investigation.

Indexed as

Infertility, MaleOligospermiaHumansMaleObesitySemenSemen AnalysisSpermatozoaSperm CountSperm Motilitymale fertilitymale reproductionobesityspermatogenesissperm qualityweight loss

Identifiers

PMID37656983
PMCPMC10795917
OpenAlexW4386358178

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.