Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37658225›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

CD31 defines a subpopulation of human adipose-derived regenerative cells with potent angiogenic effects.

Pratibha Dhumale, Jakob Vennike Nielsen, Anne Cathrine Schmidt Hansen, Mark Burton, Hans Christian Beck, Mads Gustaf Jørgensen, Navid Mohamadpour Toyserkani, Martha Kirstine Haahr, Sabrina Toft Hansen, Lars Lund and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Pratibha Dhumale *Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Jakob Vennike Nielsen *Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense, Denmark.
Anne Cathrine Schmidt HansenDepartment of Clinical Biochemistry, Odense University Hospital (OUH), Odense, Denmark.
Mark BurtonDepartment of Clinical Genetics, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Hans Christian BeckDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Mads Gustaf JørgensenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Navid Mohamadpour ToyserkaniDepartment of Plastic Surgery, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Martha Kirstine HaahrDepartment of Urology, OUH, Odense, Denmark.
Sabrina Toft HansenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Lars LundDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Mads ThomassenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Jens Ahm SørensenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Ditte Caroline AndersenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Charlotte Harken JensenDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark.
Søren Paludan SheikhDepartment of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark. soeren.sheikh@rsyd.dk.
Odense University Hospital · DKUniversity of Southern Denmark · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity represents a major challenge for regenerative treatment using freshly isolated Adipose Derived Regenerative Cells (ADRCs). Emerging data suggest superior efficacy of ADRCs as compared to the ex vivo expanded and more homogeneous ADRCs (= ASCs) for indications involving (micro)vascular deficiency, however, it remains unknown which ADRC cell subtypes account for the improvement. Surprisingly, we found regarding erectile dysfunction (ED) that the number of injected CD31+  ADRCs correlated positively with erectile function 12 months after one bolus of autologous ADRCs. Comprehensive in vitro and ex vivo analyses confirmed superior pro-angiogenic and paracrine effects of human CD31+ enriched ADRCs compared to the corresponding CD31- and parent ADRCs. When CD31+, CD31- and ADRCs were co-cultured in aortic ring- and corpus cavernous tube formation assays, the CD31+  ADRCs induced significantly higher tube development. This effect was corroborated using conditioned medium (CM), while quantitative mass spectrometric analysis suggested that this is likely explained by secretory pro-angiogenic proteins including DKK3, ANGPT2, ANAX2 and VIM, all enriched in CD31+  ADRC CM. Single-cell RNA sequencing showed that transcripts of the upregulated and secreted proteins were present in 9 endothelial ADRC subsets including endothelial progenitor cells in the heterogenous non-cultured ADRCs. Our data suggest that the vascular benefit of using ADRCs in regenerative medicine is dictated by CD31+  ADRCs.

Indexed as

Acoustic MaculaeBody FluidsAngiogenic ProteinsBiological AssayBiological TransportCulture Media, ConditionedHumansMalePlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1Angiogenic ProteinsCulture Media, ConditionedPECAM1 protein, humanPlatelet Endothelial Cell Adhesion Molecule-1

Identifiers

PMID37658225
PMCPMC10474028
OpenAlexW4386365341

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.