Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660231›Full record

ReviewThe ISME journal2023

Impact of intraspecific variation in insect microbiomes on host phenotype and evolution.

Claudia Lange, Stéphane Boyer, T Martijn Bezemer, Marie-Caroline Lefort, Manpreet K Dhami, Eva Biggs, Ronny Groenteman, Simon V Fowler, Quentin Paynter, Arletys M Verdecia Mogena and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The ISME journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
22.8field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Crosstalk in the cold: host-microbe interactions in insect diapause.Annals of the Entomological Society of America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Claudia LangeManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand. LangeC@landcareresearch.co.nz.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-4528
Stéphane BoyerInstitut de Recherche sur la Biologie de l'Insecte, UMR 7261 CNRS - Université de Tours, Tours, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0750-4864
T Martijn BezemerAbove-Belowground Interactions Group, Institute of Biology, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-2878-3479
Marie-Caroline LefortUMR 7324 CITERES, Université de Tours, Tours, France.
Manpreet K DhamiManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8956-0674
Eva BiggsManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6149-7802
Ronny GroentemanManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3444-5262
Simon V FowlerManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Lincoln, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-8356-0836
Quentin PaynterManaaki Whenua Landcare Research, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4568-5720
Arletys M Verdecia MogenaInstitute of Plant Sciences, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9437-0197
Martin KaltenpothDepartment of Insect Symbiosis, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9450-0345
Manaaki Whenua – Landcare Research · NZUniversité de Tours · FRLeiden University · NLMax Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microbes can be an important source of phenotypic plasticity in insects. Insect physiology, behaviour, and ecology are influenced by individual variation in the microbial communities held within the insect gut, reproductive organs, bacteriome, and other tissues. It is becoming increasingly clear how important the insect microbiome is for insect fitness, expansion into novel ecological niches, and novel environments. These investigations have garnered heightened interest recently, yet a comprehensive understanding of how intraspecific variation in the assembly and function of these insect-associated microbial communities can shape the plasticity of insects is still lacking. Most research focuses on the core microbiome associated with a species of interest and ignores intraspecific variation. We argue that microbiome variation among insects can be an important driver of evolution, and we provide examples showing how such variation can influence fitness and health of insects, insect invasions, their persistence in new environments, and their responses to global environmental changes. A and B are two stages of an individual or a population of the same species. The drivers lead to a shift in the insect associated microbial community, which has consequences for the host. The complex interplay of those consequences affects insect adaptation and evolution and influences insect population resilience or invasion.

Indexed as

BacteriaMicrobiotaAnimalsEcologyInsecta

Identifiers

PMID37660231
PMCPMC10579242
OpenAlexW4386391260

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.