Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660277›Full record

ArticleFEMS yeast research2023

Comparing the hierarchy of inter- and intra-species interactions with population dynamics of wine yeast cocultures.

Eléonore Pourcelot, Cleo Conacher, Thérèse Marlin, Florian Bauer, Virginie Galeote, Thibault Nidelet

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in FEMS yeast research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Eléonore PourcelotSPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34060 Montpellier, France.ORCID 0009-0003-4754-737X
Cleo ConacherDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5059-2815
Thérèse MarlinSPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Florian BauerDepartment of Viticulture and Oenology, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7602, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-5764-4542
Virginie GaleoteSPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Thibault NideletSPO, Univ Montpellier, INRAE, Institut Agro, 34060 Montpellier, France.
Université de Montpellier · FRStellenbosch University · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In winemaking, the development of new fermentation strategies, such as the use of mixed starter cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) yeast and non-Saccharomyces (NS) species, requires a better understanding of how yeasts interact, especially at the beginning of fermentation. Despite the growing knowledge on interactions between Sc and NS, few data are available on the interactions between different species of NS. It is furthermore still unclear whether interactions are primarily driven by generic differences between yeast species or whether individual strains are the evolutionarily relevant unit for biotic interactions. This study aimed at acquiring knowledge of the relevance of species and strain in the population dynamics of cocultures between five yeast species: Hanseniaspora uvarum, Lachancea thermotolerans, Starmerella bacillaris, Torulaspora delbrueckii and Sc. We performed cocultures between 15 strains in synthetic grape must and monitored growth in microplates. Both positive and negative interactions were identified. Based on an interaction index, our results showed that the population dynamics seemed mainly driven by the two species involved. Strain level was more relevant in modulating the strength of the interactions. This study provides fundamental insights into the microbial dynamics in early fermentation and contribute to the understanding of more complex consortia encompassing multiple yeasts trains.

Indexed as

VitisWineCoculture TechniquesFermentationPopulation DynamicsSaccharomyces cerevisiaediversitygenetic modificationmicrobial interactionsnon-Saccharomyces

Identifiers

PMID37660277
PMCPMC10532119
OpenAlexW4386398837

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.