ArticleFEMS yeast research2023
Comparing the hierarchy of inter- and intra-species interactions with population dynamics of wine yeast cocultures.
Article in FEMS yeast research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Microbial Competition and Nutrient Limitation Remodel the Volatilome ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Impact of direct cell-cell contact in a three-species wine yeast consortium.Applied microbiology and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Uncorking wine yeast genomics from grape to glass.FEMS yeast research · 2026Review
- Fermentative factors shape transcriptional response of Lachancea thermotolerans and wine acidification.NPJ science of food · 2025Article
- Review
- Investigating the transcriptional fingerprints of coculturedFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In winemaking, the development of new fermentation strategies, such as the use of mixed starter cultures with Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) yeast and non-Saccharomyces (NS) species, requires a better understanding of how yeasts interact, especially at the beginning of fermentation. Despite the growing knowledge on interactions between Sc and NS, few data are available on the interactions between different species of NS. It is furthermore still unclear whether interactions are primarily driven by generic differences between yeast species or whether individual strains are the evolutionarily relevant unit for biotic interactions. This study aimed at acquiring knowledge of the relevance of species and strain in the population dynamics of cocultures between five yeast species: Hanseniaspora uvarum, Lachancea thermotolerans, Starmerella bacillaris, Torulaspora delbrueckii and Sc. We performed cocultures between 15 strains in synthetic grape must and monitored growth in microplates. Both positive and negative interactions were identified. Based on an interaction index, our results showed that the population dynamics seemed mainly driven by the two species involved. Strain level was more relevant in modulating the strength of the interactions. This study provides fundamental insights into the microbial dynamics in early fermentation and contribute to the understanding of more complex consortia encompassing multiple yeasts trains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.