Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37660487›Full record

Trial reportEating behaviors2023

Adding executive function training to cognitive behavioral therapy for binge eating disorder: A pilot randomized controlled trial.

Dawn M Eichen, David R Strong, Elizabeth W Twamley, Kerri N Boutelle

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Eating behaviors, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Prefrontal Cortex Recruitment to Food Stimuli Differs in Overweight/Obesity and Binge Eating Disorder.European eating disorders review : the journal of the Eating Disorders Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dawn M EichenUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Pediatrics, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA. Electronic address: deichen@ucsd.edu.
David R StrongUniversity of California San Diego, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Elizabeth W TwamleyUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; Center of Excellence for Stress and Mental Health, VA San Diego Healthcare System, 3350 La Jolla Village Dr, San Diego, CA 92161, USA.
Kerri N BoutelleUniversity of California San Diego, Department of Pediatrics, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; University of California San Diego, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA; University of California San Diego, Department of Psychiatry, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.

Funding

UC San Diego Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR001442 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI FIRESTEIN, GARY S, HOGARTH, MICHAEL · 2015 to 2024
$88.3M
Novel Executive Function Training for ObesityK23DK114480 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN DIEGO · PI EICHEN, DAWN · 2018 to 2022
$995k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001442NIDDK NIH HHS K23 DK114480
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence-based treatments for binge eating disorder (BED), such as cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) lead to successful outcomes only about half the time. Individuals with BED often have measurable deficits in executive function (EF) that may challenge adherence to or impact of cognitive behavioral intervention components. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of adding EF training to CBT by combining CBT with a compensatory cognitive training approach (EF-CBT). Participants were 32 adults with BED, overweight/obesity, and comorbid anxiety or depression who were randomly assigned to four months of group treatment in either standard CBT or EF-CBT. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-treatment, and at 2-month follow-up. Results showed that EF-CBT was feasible and acceptable, comparable to CBT. Both groups significantly decreased loss of control (LOC) days, clinical impairment, and depression at post-treatment and 2-month follow-up; though there were no differences between groups. Neither group significantly reduced anxiety or weight. Exploratory analyses found that participants with lower EF treated with EF-CBT were less likely to have LOC at post-treatment than those with lower EF treated with CBT. Higher self-monitoring rates during treatment were associated with lower LOC at post-treatment and participants with lower EF were more likely to self-monitor in the EF-CBT arm relative to the CBT arm. These findings suggest that EF-CBT is feasible, acceptable and efficacious, although larger scale research is needed. EF-CBT may be particularly suited for individuals with BED who have lower EF.

Indexed as

Binge-Eating DisorderCognitive Behavioral TherapyAdultExecutive FunctionHumansPilot ProjectsTreatment OutcomeCognitive functionCognitive trainingLoss of controlObesityOverweight

Identifiers

PMID37660487
PMCPMC10840715

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.