Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37661245›Full record

Observational studyCJEM2023

Pain management in adult patients with sickle cell disease in the emergency department: how does current practice compare with existing standards of care?

Markus Gulilat, Lanre Tunji-Ajayi, Serena Thompson, Marie-Pascale Poku, Ruth Appiah-Boateng, Nia Navarro, Hasan Sheikh, Jennifer Hulme, Jennifer Bryan, University Health Network Emergency Department Sickle Cell Working Group

Abstract readObservational StudyComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Markus GulilatTemerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Lanre Tunji-AjayiSickle Cell Awareness Group of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Serena ThompsonPatient Advocate, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Marie-Pascale PokuSickle Cell Awareness Group of Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ruth Appiah-BoatengUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nia NavarroUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Hasan SheikhUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer HulmeUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jennifer BryanUniversity Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada. Jennifer.Bryan@utoronto.ca.ORCID 0000-0002-4639-9446
University Health Network Emergency Department Sickle Cell Working Group
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

University Health Network Physician Council on Quality and SafetyUniversity Health Network Summer Training and Research in Emergency Medicine (STAR-EM) program
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited blood disorder with a natural course punctuated by acute complications including painful vaso-occlusive episodes. The objectives were: (1) to determine what proportion of patients with SCD receive opioids within 30 min of triage as recommended by the current clinical recommendations and quality standard; and (2) to identify facilitators to timely opioid administration for patients with SCD.

methodsThis was a retrospective observational study. The primary outcome was the proportion of visits in which patients received opioid analgesia within 30 min of triage. Secondary outcomes were time in minutes from triage to any analgesic administration and time from triage to first opioid administration. Patient demographics and ED encounter characteristics were included as potential associated variables.

resultsThere were 236 patient visits (by 103 patients) that met inclusion criteria. Patients received opioid analgesia within 30 min of triage in only 5.2% of visits. The median time from triage to opioid analgesia was 80 (IQR = 49.0, 125.5) minutes. Using an order set and receiving opioid analgesia prior to physician assessment were both associated with shorter times to opioid analgesia.

conclusionExisting recommendations are that opioid analgesia be provided within 30 min of triage for patients with SCD and VOEs. Our data show this target is rarely met, even in a department in which SCD VOEs are a common presenting concern. The association of earlier opioid analgesia with order set use and administration prior to physician assessment highlights potential avenues for improving time to analgesia.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidAnemia, Sickle CellEmergency Service, HospitalPain ManagementStandard of CareAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPain MeasurementRetrospective StudiesTriageAnalgesics, OpioidBlack healthPainSickle cell diseaseVaso-occlusive episodes

Identifiers

PMID37661245
OpenAlexW4386402315

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.