Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37663156›Full record

ReviewJournal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls2023

Resistance Training in Post-COVID Recovery: Rationale and Current Evidence.

George Mills, Enya Daynes, Hamish J C McAuley, Neil J Greening, Samuel Briggs-Price, Molly M Baldwin, Sally J Singh

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of frailty, sarcopenia and falls, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

George MillsCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Enya DaynesCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Hamish J C McAuleyCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Neil J GreeningCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Samuel Briggs-PriceCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Molly M BaldwinCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Sally J SinghCentre of Exercise and Rehabilitation Science, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre - Respiratory, University Hospitals Leicester, Leicester, UK.
University of Leicester · GBNIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During hospitalisation with COVID-19, individuals may experience prolonged periods of immobilisation. Combined with the inflammatory effects of the virus, this may lead to a significant reduction in both muscle mass and strength. Data from several long-term studies suggest that these symptoms may not fully resolve within one year. Owing to its effectiveness at inducing muscle fibre hypertrophy and improving neuromuscular efficiency, resistance training is of great interest in the rehabilitation of this population. This narrative review aims to identify the rationale and potential efficacy of resistance training for restoring physical function following infection with SARS-CoV-2, as well as evidence of its use in clinical practice. The studies included in this narrative review consisted mostly of multi-component rehabilitation trials. Of these, widespread improvements in muscle strength were reported using intensities of up to 80% of participants' 1-repetition-maximum. Evidence thus far indicates that resistance training may be safe and effective in patients following COVID-19, although its individual contribution is difficult to discern. Future exercise intervention studies investigating the efficacy of resistance training as a sole modality are needed.

Indexed as

COVID-19ExerciseMuscleRehabilitationResistance training

Identifiers

PMID37663156
PMCPMC10472035
OpenAlexW4386307768

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.