ReviewCureus2023
The Role of Genetic Testing in Pediatric Renal Diseases: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Social Implications.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Redefining Alport syndrome in the era of genomic medicine: time for a unified, genotype-driven nomenclature.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Article
- Exome analysis links kidney malformations to developmental disorders and reveals causal genes.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Modern Management of Common Bile Duct Stones: Breakthroughs, Challenges, and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2024Review
- [Research progress on monogenic inherited glomerular diseases with central nervous system symptoms].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pediatric renal diseases vary widely and are linked to high morbidity and mortality; hence, early diagnosis is vital. Presently, genetic testing is being incorporated into the standard of care for children and their families with kidney disease, primarily as a diagnostic tool. In the present review, we aim to collect all potential evidence from relevant studies that reported the role of genetic testing in pediatric renal disease diagnostic, prognostic, and social implications. We have conducted both electronic and manual searches within PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus to find relevant studies. Studies from the years 2013-2023 were included. Case reports with limited sample sizes and no descriptive statistics, along with review papers and meta-analyses, were excluded from this review. Quality assessment for all included studies was performed. The pooled diagnostic yields were calculated using the common effect and random effect models utilizing the R program (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria). The pooled result for the diagnostic yield as per the common effect model is a pooled proportion of 0.42 (42%) 95% confidence interval (CI): [0.39,0.44], while with the random effects model the pooled proportion is 0.43 (43%) 95% CI: [0.31,0.57]. The diagnostic yield for the included studies ranged from 78.10% to 16.8%. The spectrum of kidney diseases included nephrolithiasis/nephrocalcinosis, glomerular diseases, cystic kidney disease, ciliopathies, tubulopathies, chronic kidney disease, and congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tracts (CAKUT), while hematuria and proteinuria were reported by two studies and autosomal recessive and autosomal dominant idiopathic kidney disease was reported by only one study. Genetic testing validates clinical diagnosis and aids in tailoring management strategies; hence, a more precise treatment plan is developed and unnecessary investigations are avoided, which is crucial in the case of children during routine nephrology clinic visits. Genetic counselling is of the utmost importance, so all ethical and social concerns related to genetic testing are addressed in addition to patient satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.