ArticleClinical kidney journal2023
Women's representation in clinical trials of patients with chronic kidney disease.
Article in Clinical kidney journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sexual dimorphism shapes renal metabolic adaptation to a ketogenic diet.Cell reports · 2026Article
- Sex and Gender Differences in Chronic Kidney Disease-Explained by the Brenner-Luyckx Concept of Hyperfiltration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Toward Equitable Kidney Care: Insights from the Survey Among Polish Doctors on the Women's Health in Chronic Kidney Disease Management.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Sex Differences Across Corticosteroid Response and Outcomes in IgA Nephropathy.Kidney international reports · 2025Article
- Sex Differences in Cardiovascular Diseases and Vascular Function in Chronic Kidney Disease.Cardiology clinics · 2025Review
- Guidelines for sex-specific considerations to improve rigor in renal research and how we got there.American journal of physiology. Renal physiology · 2025Review
- Evaluating artificial intelligence bias in nephrology: the role of diversity, equity, and inclusion in AI-driven decision-making and ethical regulation.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
- Article
- Sex disparities in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes in chronic kidney disease.Clinical kidney journal · 2024Review
- Novel Perspectives in Chronic Kidney Disease-Specific Cardiovascular Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Review
- Cardiovascular disease in older women with CKD.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Shedding a light on sex disparity in clinical trials in CKD patients.Clinical kidney journal · 2023Article
- Sex and gender differences in the management of chronic kidney disease and hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sex and gender differences in chronic kidney disease (CKD), including epidemiology and response to treatment, remain poorly understood. This study aimed to investigate how women are represented in CKD clinical trials and whether sex- and gender-disaggregated outcomes were reported. Methods: Clinical trials on CKD were identified from ClinicalTrials.gov. Randomised, phase 3/4 trials with ≥100 participants were selected to quantify women's representation among participants by computing the participation:prevalence ratio (PPR) and investigating whether sex-disaggregated analyses had been performed. Results: In total, 192 CKD trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov and published between 1995 and 2022 were included. Overall, women accounted for 66 875 (45%) of the 147 136 participants. Women's participation in clinical trials was lower than their representation in the underlying CKD population globally (55%). The PPR was 0.75 (95% confidence interval 0.72-0.78), with no significant variation irrespective of mean age, CKD stage, dialysis, location, type of intervention or funding agency. A total of 39 (20%) trials reported sex-disaggregated efficacy outcomes and none reported sex-disaggregated safety outcomes. Conclusion: Women's participation in CKD clinical trials was lower than their representation in the underlying CKD population. Sex-disaggregated efficacy and safety outcomes were rarely reported. Improving women's enrolment into clinical trials is crucial to enable sex- and gender-disaggregated analysis and thus identify potential differences in treatment response between women and men.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.