Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37669015›Full record

ReviewPerspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science2025

Past, Present, and Future of Human Chemical Communication Research.

Helene M Loos, Benoist Schaal, Bettina M Pause, Monique A M Smeets, Camille Ferdenzi, S Craig Roberts, Jasper de Groot, Katrin T Lübke, Ilona Croy, Jessica Freiherr and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Neural Tracking of the Maternal Voice in the Infant Brain.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 10 institutions in 6 countries.

Helene M LoosDepartment of Chemistry and Pharmacy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg.ORCID 0000-0002-9112-5735
Benoist SchaalDevelopment of Olfactory Cognition and Communication Lab, Centre des Sciences du Goût et de l'Alimentation, CNRS UMR 6265, Université de Bourgogne.
Bettina M PauseDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Monique A M SmeetsFaculty of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Utrecht University.
Camille FerdenziCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier.
S Craig RobertsDivision of Psychology, University of Stirling.
Jasper de GrootBehavioral Science Institute, Radboud University.
Katrin T LübkeDepartment of Experimental Psychology, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf.
Ilona CroyInstitute for Psychology, Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
Jessica FreiherrDepartment of Sensory Analytics and Technologies, Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging IVV.
Moustafa BensafiCentre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon, CNRS UMR 5292, Inserm U1028, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier.
Thomas HummelSmell and Taste Clinic, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, TU Dresden.
Jan HavlíčekDepartment of Zoology, Charles University.ORCID 0000-0003-2374-7337
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEHeinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCharles University · CZFriedrich Schiller University Jena · DERadboud University Nijmegen · NLTaste and Smell Clinic · USUniversité de Bourgogne · FRUniversity of Stirling · GBUtrecht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although chemical signaling is an essential mode of communication in most vertebrates, it has long been viewed as having negligible effects in humans. However, a growing body of evidence shows that the sense of smell affects human behavior in social contexts ranging from affiliation and parenting to disease avoidance and social threat. This article aims to (a) introduce research on human chemical communication in the historical context of the behavioral sciences; (b) provide a balanced overview of recent advances that describe individual differences in the emission of semiochemicals and the neural mechanisms underpinning their perception, that together demonstrate communicative function; and (c) propose directions for future research toward unraveling the molecular principles involved and understanding the variability in the generation, transmission, and reception of chemical signals in increasingly ecologically valid conditions. Achieving these goals will enable us to address some important societal challenges but are within reach only with the aid of genuinely interdisciplinary approaches.

Indexed as

CommunicationHumansPheromonesPheromones, HumanSmellPheromonesPheromones, Humanbehaviorbody odorolfactionsocial interactions

Identifiers

PMID37669015
PMCPMC11720269
OpenAlexW4386438965

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.