Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37672177›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2024

Changing the stroke network during pandemic scenarios does not affect the management of patients with a positive Cincinnati prehospital stroke scale.

Nazzareno Fagoni, Lorenzo Bellini, Rodolfo Bonora, Marco Botteri, Maurizio Migliari, Andrea Pagliosa, Giuseppe Maria Sechi, Carlo Signorelli, Alberto Zoli, Giuseppe Stirparo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nazzareno FagoniDepartment of Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy. nazzareno.fagoni@unibs.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7312-8174
Lorenzo BelliniFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Rodolfo BonoraDepartment of Research and Development, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Marco BotteriAAT Brescia, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza (AREU), ASST Spedali Civili Di Brescia, Brescia, Italy.
Maurizio MigliariDepartment of Research and Development, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Andrea PagliosaDepartment of Research and Development, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe Maria SechiDepartment of Research and Development, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Carlo SignorelliFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Alberto ZoliDepartment of Research and Development, Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza Headquarters (AREU HQ), Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe StirparoFaculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Vita-Salute San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
Agenzia Regionale Emergenza Urgenza · ITVita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITAzienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale degli Spedali Civili di Brescia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTime plays a crucial role in the management of stroke, and changing the prehospital emergency network, altering the HUB and spoke relationship in pandemic scenarios, might have an impact on time to fibrinolysis or thrombectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the time-dependent stroke emergency network in Lombardy region (Italy) by comparing 2019 with 2020 and early 2021. Three parameters were investigated: (i) time of arrival of the first vehicle at the scene, (ii) overall duration of missions, and (iii) number of patients transported by emergency vehicles.

methodsData analysis process conducted using the SAS-AREU portal (SAS Institute, USA).

resultsThe number of patients with a positive CPSS was similar among the different pandemic waves. Mission duration increased from a mean time (SD) of 52.9 (16.1) min in 2019 to 64.1 (19.7) in 2020 and 55.0 (16.8) in 2021. Time to first vehicle on scene increased to 15.7 (8.4) min in 2020 and 16.0 (7.0) in 2021 compared to 2019, 13.6 (7.2) (P < 0.05). The number of hospital with available stroke units decreased from 46 in 2019 to 10 during the first pandemic wave.

conclusionsThe pandemic forced changes in the clinical mission of many hospitals by reducing the number of stroke units. Despite this, the organization of the emergency system allowed to identify strategic hospitals and thus avoid excessive transport time. The result was an adequate time for fibrinolysis/thrombectomy, in agreement with the guidelines. Coordinated management in emergency situations makes it possible to maintain service quality standards, despite the unfavorable scenario.

Indexed as

Emergency Medical ServicesStrokeAmbulancesHumansPandemicsRetrospective StudiesCerebral ischemiaEmergency medical servicesPrehospital

Identifiers

PMID37672177
PMCPMC10791942
OpenAlexW4386466973

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.