Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37673975›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Genetics2024

Computational methods for analysing multiscale 3D genome organization.

Yang Zhang, Lorenzo Boninsegna, Muyu Yang, Tom Misteli, Frank Alber, Jian Ma

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Genetics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Investigating Phase Separation in Genome Folding via Multiscale Computational Modeling.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A data-driven chromatin model reveals spatial and dynamic features of genome organization.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yang ZhangComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1483-9195
Lorenzo BoninsegnaDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics and Institute for Quantitative and Computational Biosciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4529-3567
Muyu YangComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tom MisteliCenter for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, USA. mistelit@mail.nih.gov.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3530-3020
Frank AlberDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology and Molecular Genetics and Institute for Quantitative and Computational Biosciences, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA. falber@g.ucla.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1981-8390
Jian MaComputational Biology Department, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA, USA. jianma@cs.cmu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4202-5834

Funding

Nuclear Architecture and DiseaseZIABC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 2009 to 2025
$39.8M
Multiscale Analyses of 4D Nucleome Structure and Function by Comprehensive Multimodal Data IntegrationUM1HG011593 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI ALBER, FRANK, BELMONT, ANDREW STEVEN · 2020 to 2024
$10.4M
Nuclear architecture and gene expression Z01BC010309 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI MISTELI, THOMAS A · 1999 to 2008
$3.6M
Computational Methods for Next-Generation Comparative GenomicsR01HG007352 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN · PI MA, JIAN · 2014 to 2023
$2.8M
Computational methods for studying single-cell 3D genomeR01HG012303 · NHGRI · CARNEGIE-MELLON UNIVERSITY · PI DUAN, ZHIJUN, MA, JIAN · 2022 to 2025
$2.2M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 BC010309Intramural NIH HHS ZIA BC010309NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG007352NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG012303NHGRI NIH HHS UM1 HG011593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent progress in whole-genome mapping and imaging technologies has enabled the characterization of the spatial organization and folding of the genome in the nucleus. In parallel, advanced computational methods have been developed to leverage these mapping data to reveal multiscale three-dimensional (3D) genome features and to provide a more complete view of genome structure and its connections to genome functions such as transcription. Here, we discuss how recently developed computational tools, including machine-learning-based methods and integrative structure-modelling frameworks, have led to a systematic, multiscale delineation of the connections among different scales of 3D genome organization, genomic and epigenomic features, functional nuclear components and genome function. However, approaches that more comprehensively integrate a wide variety of genomic and imaging datasets are still needed to uncover the functional role of 3D genome structure in defining cellular phenotypes in health and disease.

Indexed as

GenomeGenomicsChromatinChromosome MappingEpigenomicsChromatin

Identifiers

PMID37673975
PMCPMC11127719

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.