ArticleReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2024
Significance and Influence of Suturing for Ovarian Tissue Transplantation.
Article in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
The purpose of this animal study was to verify the effect of suturing on graft function in ovarian tissue transplantation. Ovaries from 2-week-old rats were transplanted orthotopically into the ovaries of 8-week-old female Wistar rats. The various transplantation methods used were insertion into the ovarian bursa without suturing (group A: control), suturing with a single 6-0 Vicryl stitch (group B: 6-0*1), suturing with a single 10-0 Vicryl stitch (group C: 10-0*1), and suturing with three 10-0 Vicryl stitches (group D: 10-0*3). Two weeks after transplantation, the transplanted ovaries were evaluated histologically and for gene expression. Engraftment rates of the donor ovaries 14 days after transplantation were 62.5%, 100%, 91.7%, and 100% in groups A, B, C, and D, respectively, significantly lower in group A than in the other groups. In terms of gene expression, TNFα levels were significantly higher in group D, and GDF9 and follicle-stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR) levels were significantly lower in group D than in groups A and B. The number of primordial follicles evaluated by HE staining was significantly lower in groups B, C, and D than in group A. Compared to orthotopic transplantation without sutures, direct suturing to the host improved the engraftment rate, although increasing the number of sutures increased inflammatory marker levels and decreased the number of primordial follicles. We believe that it is important to perform ovarian tissue transplantation using optimal suture diameter for good adhesion, but with a minimum number of sutures to preserve ovarian function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.