Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37680915›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2023

Perioperative perampanel administration for early seizure prophylaxis in brain tumor patients.

Kosuke Kusakabe, Akihiro Inoue, Hideaki Watanabe, Yawara Nakamura, Masahiro Nishikawa, Yoshihiro Ohtsuka, Masahiro Ogura, Seiji Shigekawa, Mashio Taniwaki, Riko Kitazawa and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kosuke KusakabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Akihiro InoueDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Hideaki WatanabeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Yawara NakamuraDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Masahiro NishikawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Yoshihiro OhtsukaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Masahiro OguraDepartment of Rehabilitation, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
Seiji ShigekawaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Mashio TaniwakiDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
Riko KitazawaDivision of Diagnostic Pathology, Ehime University Hospital, Toon, Japan.
Takeharu KuniedaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Ehime University School of Medicine, Toon, Japan.
Ehime University · JPEhime University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of perioperative prophylactic antiepileptic drug therapy in "seizure-naïve" patients with brain tumor, including glioblastoma (GBM), remains controversial. This study investigated whether perampanel (PER) is effective and safe for preventing perioperative onset of epileptic seizures, so-called early seizure, in patients with brain tumors. Methods: Forty-five patients underwent tumor resection through craniotomy for a primary supratentorial brain tumor at Ehime University Hospital between April 2021 and July 2022. PER was administered from the 1 Results: In 45 patients with brain tumor, including GBM, who received PER administration, no early seizures were identified within 7 days postoperatively. No adverse drug reactions such as hematological toxicity, liver or kidney dysfunction, or exanthematous drug eruption were observed in any cases. As side effects, somnolence was reported in 14 patients (31.1%), vertigo in 3 patients (6.7%), and headache in 3 patients (6.7%). Although somnolence and vertigo were difficult to assess in the case of intraparenchymal tumors, particularly GBM, these side effects were not identified in patients with extraparenchymal tumors such as meningiomas, epidermoid cysts, and pituitary adenomas. In addition, no significant differences were identified compared to patients who received LEV. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of PER in preventing early seizures among patients with brain tumors were retrospectively evaluated. Perioperative administration of PER to patients with brain tumors may reduce the risk of early seizures without incurring serious side effects, showing no significant differences compared to patients who received LEV.

Indexed as

Brain tumor-related epilepsyEarly seizureGlioblastomaPerampanelSide effect

Identifiers

PMID37680915
PMCPMC10481804
OpenAlexW4385766079

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.