Evidence mapPaperPMID 37684384Full record

ArticleNeurochemical research2024

Novel Proline Transporter Inhibitor (LQFM215) Presents Antipsychotic Effect in Ketamine Model of Schizophrenia.

Gustavo Almeida Carvalho, Raphaela Almeida Chiareli, João Francisco Cordeiro Pedrazzi, Danyelle Silva-Amaral, André Luís Batista da Rocha, Onésia Cristina Oliveira-Lima, Luciano Morais Lião, Elaine Maria de Souza-Fagundes, Stefan Schildknecht, Marcel Leist and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurochemical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 48% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unveiling the Structure of PROT and ATBMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 7 institutions in 3 countries.

Gustavo Almeida CarvalhoLaboratório de Neuroquímica e Neurofarmacologia, Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Av. Esperança, S/N, UFG, Prédio ICB II, Sala 114, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Raphaela Almeida ChiareliLaboratório de Neuroquímica e Neurofarmacologia, Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Av. Esperança, S/N, UFG, Prédio ICB II, Sala 114, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
João Francisco Cordeiro PedrazziDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Danyelle Silva-AmaralDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
André Luís Batista da RochaFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Onésia Cristina Oliveira-LimaLaboratório de Neuroquímica e Neurofarmacologia, Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Av. Esperança, S/N, UFG, Prédio ICB II, Sala 114, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil.
Luciano Morais LiãoFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Elaine Maria de Souza-FagundesInstituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Stefan SchildknechtFaculty of Life Sciences, Albstadt-Sigmaringen University, 72488, Sigmaringen, Germany.
Marcel LeistIn Vitro Toxicology and Biomedicine, Doerenkamp-Zbinden Foundation, University of Konstanz, Konstanz, Germany.
Elaine Aparecida Del-BelDepartamento de Neurociências e Ciências do Comportamento, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto (FMRP), Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renato Santiago GomezFaculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Alexander BirbrairDepartment of Dermatology, Medical Sciences Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Rm 4385, 1300 University Avenue, Madison, WI, 53706, USA.
Ricardo MenegattiFaculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiânia, GO, Brazil.
Mauro Cunha Xavier PintoLaboratório de Neuroquímica e Neurofarmacologia, Departamento de Farmacologia, Instituto de Ciências Biológicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Av. Esperança, S/N, UFG, Prédio ICB II, Sala 114, Goiânia, GO, 74690-900, Brazil. pintomcx@gmail.com.
Universidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRAlbstadt-Sigmaringen University · DEInstituto de Neurociências e Comportamento · BRUniversity of Konstanz · DEUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung 99999.008121/2014-01Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 406765/2021-9Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 407075/2018-6ENDpoiNTs 825759EU-ToxRisk 681002FAPEG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Goiás 88887.305550/2018-00FAPEMIG - Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais APQ-00820-17
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The glutamatergic hypothesis of schizophrenia suggests a correlation between NMDA receptor hypofunction and negative psychotic symptoms. It has been observed that the expression of the proline transporter (PROT) in the central nervous system (CNS) is associated with glutamatergic neurotransmission, as L-proline has the capacity to activate and modulate AMPA and NMDA receptors. In this study, we aimed to investigate whether inhibition of proline transporters could enhance glutamatergic neurotransmission and potentially exhibit antipsychotic effects in an experimental schizophrenia model. Using molecular dynamics analysis in silico, we validated an innovative PROT inhibitor, LQFM215. We quantified the cytotoxicity of LQFM215 in the Lund human mesencephalic cell line (LUHMES). Subsequently, we employed the ketamine-induced psychosis model to evaluate the antipsychotic potential of the inhibitor, employing behavioral tests including open-field, three-chamber interaction, and prepulse inhibition (PPI). Our results demonstrate that LQFM215, at pharmacologically active concentrations, exhibited negligible neurotoxicity when astrocytes were co-cultured with neurons. In the ketamine-induced psychosis model, LQFM215 effectively reduced hyperlocomotion and enhanced social interaction in a three-chamber social approach task across all administered doses. Moreover, the compound successfully prevented the ketamine-induced disruption of sensorimotor gating in the PPI test at all tested doses. Overall, these findings suggest that PROT inhibition could serve as a potential therapeutic target for managing symptoms of schizophrenia model.

Indexed as

Amino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralAntipsychotic AgentsKetamineSchizophreniaHumansReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateAmino Acid Transport Systems, NeutralAntipsychotic AgentsKetamineproline transporterReceptors, N-Methyl-D-AspartateDrug discoveryGlutamatergic neurotransmissionSchizophreniaSLC6A7SLC family transportersTarget validation

Identifiers

PMID37684384
OpenAlexW4386564557

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.