Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37685681›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023

The Role of Early Serum Biomarkers and Clinical Rating Scales in the Prediction of Delayed Cerebral Ischaemia and Short-Term Outcome after Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage: Single Centre Experience.

Małgorzata Burzyńska, Agnieszka Uryga, Jowita Woźniak, Rafał Załuski, Chiara Robba, Waldemar Goździk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Old Wine in a New Bottle: Vasograde Scale and Biomarkers, Composite Model in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Małgorzata BurzyńskaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2318-7130
Agnieszka UrygaDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, 50-370 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8183-7643
Jowita WoźniakDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Rafał ZałuskiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.
Chiara RobbaAnesthesia and Intensive Care, San Martino Policlinico Hospital, IRCCS for Oncology and Neurosciences, 16132 Genoa, Italy.
Waldemar GoździkDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-367 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8668-1641
Wroclaw Medical University · PLOspedale Policlinico San Martino · ITWrocław University of Science and Technology · PL

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University SUBK.A170.23.048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Considering the variety of complications that arise after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage (aSAH) and the complex pathomechanism of delayed cerebral ischaemia (DCI), the task of predicting the outcome assumes a profound complexity. Therefore, there is a need to develop early predictive and decision-making models. This study explores the effect of serum biomarkers and clinical scales on patients' outcomes and their interrelationship with DCI and systemic complications in aSAH. This was a retrospective analysis including aSAH patients admitted to the Wroclaw University Hospital (Wrocław, Poland) from 2011 to 2020. A good outcome was defined as a modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0-2. The prediction of the development of DCI and poor outcome was conducted using logistic regression as a standard model (SM) and random forest as a machine learning method (ML). A cohort of 174 aSAH patients were included in the analysis. DCI was diagnosed in 79 (45%) patients. Significant differences between patients with poor vs. good outcome were determined from their levels of albumin (31 ± 7 vs. 35 ± 5 (g/L);

Indexed as

outcome assessmentpersonalized medicineSAH

Identifiers

PMID37685681
PMCPMC10488375
OpenAlexW4386250843

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.