Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686553›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Recurrent Glioblastoma: A Review of the Treatment Options.

Maria Angeles Vaz-Salgado, María Villamayor, Víctor Albarrán, Víctor Alía, Pilar Sotoca, Jesús Chamorro, Diana Rosero, Ana M Barrill, Mercedes Martín, Eva Fernandez and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 100 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
100citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

100 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. FET-PETTranslational cancer research · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Post-recurrence management of malignant glial brain tumors: therapeutic strategies, evidence and limitations, palliative care, terminal sedation, and end-of-life considerations.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. A Mussel-Inspired Bioadhesive Patch to Selectively Kill Glioblastoma Cells.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article

40 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Maria Angeles Vaz-SalgadoMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
María VillamayorMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7187-5758
Víctor AlbarránMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6356-2551
Víctor AlíaMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-1013-8105
Pilar SotocaMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Jesús ChamorroMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Diana RoseroMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Ana M BarrillMedical Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes MartínRadiotherapy Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Eva FernandezRadiotherapy Oncology Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
José Antonio GutierrezNeurosurgery Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Luis Mariano Rojas-MedinaNeurosurgery Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.
Luis LeyNeurosurgery Department, Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, 28034 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-4770-8271

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glioblastoma is a disease with a poor prognosis. Multiple efforts have been made to improve the long-term outcome, but the 5-year survival rate is still 5-10%. Recurrence of the disease is the usual way of progression. In this situation, there is no standard treatment. Different treatment options can be considered. Among them would be reoperation or reirradiation. There are different studies that have assessed the impact on survival and the selection of patients who may benefit most from these strategies. Chemotherapy treatments have also been considered in several studies, mainly with alkylating agents, with data mostly from phase II studies. On the other hand, multiple studies have been carried out with target-directed treatments. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody with anti-angiogenic activity, has demonstrated activity in several studies, and the FDA has approved it for this indication. Several other TKI drugs have been evaluated in this setting, but no clear benefit has been demonstrated. Immunotherapy treatments have been shown to be effective in other types of tumors, and several studies have evaluated their efficacy in this disease, both immune checkpoint inhibitors, oncolytic viruses, and vaccines. This paper reviews data from different studies that have evaluated the efficacy of different forms of relapsed glioblastoma.

Indexed as

brain tumorglioblastomaglioblastoma chemotherapyglioblastoma radiotherapyglioblastoma surgimmunotherapyrecurrent glioblastoma

Identifiers

PMID37686553
PMCPMC10487236

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.