Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37686558›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

Artificial Intelligence in Urooncology: What We Have and What We Expect.

Anita Froń, Alina Semianiuk, Uladzimir Lazuk, Kuba Ptaszkowski, Agnieszka Siennicka, Artur Lemiński, Wojciech Krajewski, Tomasz Szydełko, Bartosz Małkiewicz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Navigating advanced renal cell carcinoma in the era of artificial intelligence.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. AI in Prostate Cancer Screening & Diagnosis: A Registry-Based Study of ClinicalTrials.gov Trials.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financing
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Anita FrońDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Alina SemianiukDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Uladzimir LazukDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Kuba PtaszkowskiDepartment of Physiotherapy, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-368 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5690-5226
Agnieszka SiennickaDepartment of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-0988-5821
Artur LemińskiDepartment of Urology and Urological Oncology, Pomeranian Medical University, 70-111 Szczecin, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1446-2970
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Tomasz SzydełkoDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-3753

Funding

Wroclaw Medical University SUBZ.C090.23.080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionArtificial intelligence is transforming healthcare by driving innovation, automation, and optimization across various fields of medicine. The aim of this study was to determine whether artificial intelligence (AI) techniques can be used in the diagnosis, treatment planning, and monitoring of urological cancers. METHODOLOGY: We conducted a thorough search for original and review articles published until 31 May 2022 in the PUBMED/Scopus database. Our search included several terms related to AI and urooncology. Articles were selected with the consensus of all authors.

resultsSeveral types of AI can be used in the medical field. The most common forms of AI are machine learning (ML), deep learning (DL), neural networks (NNs), natural language processing (NLP) systems, and computer vision. AI can improve various domains related to the management of urologic cancers, such as imaging, grading, and nodal staging. AI can also help identify appropriate diagnoses, treatment options, and even biomarkers. In the majority of these instances, AI is as accurate as or sometimes even superior to medical doctors.

conclusionsAI techniques have the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of urologic cancers. The use of AI in urooncology care is expected to increase in the future, leading to improved patient outcomes and better overall management of these tumors.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencemachine learningprostate cancerurooncology

Identifiers

PMID37686558
PMCPMC10486651

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.