Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37693852›Full record

ArticleNature machine intelligence2023

Multimodal data fusion for cancer biomarker discovery with deep learning.

Sandra Steyaert, Marija Pizurica, Divya Nagaraj, Priya Khandelwal, Tina Hernandez-Boussard, Andrew J Gentles, Olivier Gevaert

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature machine intelligence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 164 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
164citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
55.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

164 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 317 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Deep integration of clinical metadata with [European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Multi-modal learning with incomplete data.Nature communications · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

104 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sandra SteyaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University.
Marija PizuricaStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University.
Divya NagarajDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University.
Priya KhandelwalDepartment of Computer Science, Stanford University.
Tina Hernandez-BoussardStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University.
Andrew J GentlesStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University.
Olivier GevaertStanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Department of Medicine, Stanford University.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Multi-scale modeling of glioma for the prediction of treatment response, treatment monitoring and treatment allocationR01CA260271 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI GEVAERT, OLIVIER · 2021 to 2025
$3.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA260271
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Technological advances now make it possible to study a patient from multiple angles with high-dimensional, high-throughput multi-scale biomedical data. In oncology, massive amounts of data are being generated ranging from molecular, histopathology, radiology to clinical records. The introduction of deep learning has significantly advanced the analysis of biomedical data. However, most approaches focus on single data modalities leading to slow progress in methods to integrate complementary data types. Development of effective multimodal fusion approaches is becoming increasingly important as a single modality might not be consistent and sufficient to capture the heterogeneity of complex diseases to tailor medical care and improve personalised medicine. Many initiatives now focus on integrating these disparate modalities to unravel the biological processes involved in multifactorial diseases such as cancer. However, many obstacles remain, including lack of usable data as well as methods for clinical validation and interpretation. Here, we cover these current challenges and reflect on opportunities through deep learning to tackle data sparsity and scarcity, multimodal interpretability, and standardisation of datasets.

Identifiers

PMID37693852
PMCPMC10484010
OpenAlexW4362673398

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.