Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697142›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of behavioral medicine2024

The Effectiveness of Low-Intensity Psychological Interventions for Comorbid Depression and Anxiety in Patients with Long-Term Conditions: A Real-World Naturalistic Observational Study in IAPT Integrated Care.

Chi Tak Lee, Siobhan Harty, Adedeji Adegoke, Jorge Palacios, Claire M Gillan, Derek Richards

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of behavioral medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Early-stage profiles of adolescent mental health difficulties and well-being: A systematic review of cluster analyses in large school and community samples.Journal of research on adolescence : the official journal of the Society for Research on Adolescence · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Chi Tak LeeSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland. clee9@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3404-5368
Siobhan HartySchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Adedeji AdegokeSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Jorge PalaciosSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Claire M GillanSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Derek RichardsSchool of Psychology, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Trinity College Dublin · IE

Funding

Irish Research Council EPSPG/2020/8
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLow-intensity psychological interventions may be a cost-effective, accessible solution for treating depression and anxiety in patients with long-term conditions, but evidence from real-world service settings is lacking. This study examined the effectiveness of low-intensity psychological interventions provided in the Improving Access to Psychological Therapies programme in England for patients with and without long-term conditions.

methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on patients (total N = 21,051, long-term conditions n = 4024) enrolled in three low-intensity psychological interventions, i.e. Internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (iCBT), guided self-help (GSH), and psychoeducational group therapy (PGT) within a Talking Therapies service from 2016 to 2020. Primary outcomes included pre-post-treatment changes in depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9) and anxiety (Generalised Anxiety Disorder-7).

resultsOverall, both cohorts significantly improved on all outcomes post-treatment, with large effect sizes. Patients with long-term conditions experienced a greater reduction in depression while those without experienced a greater reduction in anxiety, but these differences were marginal (< 1 score difference on both measures). No difference between the cohorts was shown when comparing the differential effectiveness across interventions, but those engaging in iCBT showed greater reduction in depression and anxiety than those in GSH and PGT, while those in GSH improved more than PGT.

conclusionsLow-intensity psychological interventions, particularly iCBT, were effective in treating depression and anxiety in patients with long-term conditions in a real-world service setting. Our large-scale study supports the continued and increased implementation of low-intensity psychological interventions for this subpopulation via integrated care.

Indexed as

Cognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionAdultAgedAnxietyAnxiety DisordersChronic DiseaseComorbidityDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedEnglandFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychotherapy, GroupRetrospective StudiesAnxietyDepressionLong-term conditionPsychological comorbiditiesPsychological interventionsReal world

Identifiers

PMID37697142
PMCPMC11452547
OpenAlexW4386597826

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.