Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37697339›Full record

ArticleBMC palliative care2023

Kenyan palliative care providers' and leaders' perceptions of palliative care research needs and support to facilitate rigorous research.

K B Cartmell, E A Doherty, N Gikaara, Z Ali, S Qanungo, E S Melikam, R A Powell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC palliative care, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

K B CartmellDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA. kcartme@clemson.edu.
E A DohertyDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
N GikaaraDepartment of Medicine, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya.
Z AliKenyan Hospice and Palliative Care Association, Nairobi, Kenya.
S QanungoCollege of Nursing, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
E S MelikamDepartment of Public Health Sciences, College of Behavioral, Social and Health Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
R A PowellDepartment of Primary Care and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, England.
Clemson University · USAga Khan University Nairobi · KEImperial College London · GBMedical University of South Carolina · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPalliative care (PC) can reduce symptom distress and improve quality of life for patients and their families experiencing life-threatening illness. While the need for PC in Kenya is high, PC service delivery and research is limited. Qualitative research is needed to explore potential areas for PC research and support needed to enable that research. This insight is critical for informing a national PC research agenda and mobilizing limited resources for conducting rigorous PC research in Kenya.

objectivesTo explore perceptions of priority areas for PC research and support needed to facilitate rigorous research from the perspective of Kenyan PC providers and leaders.

methodsFocus groups (FGs) were conducted in November and December of 2018 using a semi-structured interview guide. FGs were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using a thematic content analysis approach.

resultsThree FGs were conducted (n = 22 participants). Ten themes related to PC research emerged, including research on: 1) beliefs about death, disease, and treatment to inform PC; 2) awareness about PC, 3) integration of PC within the health system; 4) understanding caregiver experiences and needs; 5) community health volunteers (CHVs) and volunteer programs; 6) evaluation of costs and benefits of PC; 7) treatment approaches, including complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and advanced diagnostics at end of life; 8) other suggestions for research, 9) populations in need of PC research; and 10) resources for enabling research.

conclusionsKenyan PC providers and leaders identified key areas requiring increased scientific inquiry and critical resources needed to enable this research. These findings can help to focus future PC research in Kenya and encourage funding agencies to prioritize the issues identified.

Indexed as

Hospice and Palliative Care NursingPalliative CareFocus GroupsHumansKenyaQuality of LifeFocus groupsHospicePalliative careQualitative researchResearch capacity

Identifiers

PMID37697339
PMCPMC10496291
OpenAlexW4386594261

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.