Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37700643›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2023

What's in a mate? Social pairing decisions and spatial cognitive ability in food-caching mountain chickadees.

Carrie L Branch, Joseph F Welklin, Benjamin R Sonnenberg, Lauren M Benedict, Virginia K Heinen, Angela M Pitera, Eli S Bridge, Vladimir V Pravosudov

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Living on the edge: the evolution of spatial cognition in food-caching chickadees.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. The function of episodic memory in animals.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Carrie L BranchDepartment of Psychology, The University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4671-2420
Joseph F WelklinDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7534-8795
Benjamin R SonnenbergDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4496-4269
Lauren M BenedictDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1540-6663
Virginia K HeinenDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1804-3589
Angela M PiteraDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6166-3639
Eli S BridgeDepartment of Biology, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK, USA.
Vladimir V PravosudovDepartment of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Reno, NV, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1117-7875

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While researchers have investigated mating decisions for decades, gaps remain in our understanding of how behaviour influences social mate choice. We compared spatial cognitive performance and food caching propensity within social pairs of mountain chickadees inhabiting differentially harsh winter climates to understand how these measures contribute to social mate choice. Chickadees rely on specialized spatial cognitive abilities to recover food stores and survive harsh winters, and females can discriminate among males with varying spatial cognition. Because spatial cognition and caching propensity are critical for survival and likely heritable, pairing with a mate with such enhanced traits may provide indirect benefits to offspring. Comparing the behaviour of social mates, we found that spatial cognitive performance approached a significant correlation within pairs at low, but not at high elevation. We found no correlation within pairs in spatial reversal cognitive performance at either elevation; however, females at high elevation tended to perform better than their social mates. Finally, we found that caching propensity correlated within pairs at low, while males cached significantly more food than their social mates at high elevations. These results suggest that cognition and caching propensity may influence social mating decisions, but only in certain environments and for some aspects of cognition.

Indexed as

CognitionSongbirdsAnimalsCell CommunicationClimateFemaleFoodMalePhenotypeassortative matingchickadeesenvironmental variationsocial mate choicespatial cognition

Identifiers

PMID37700643
PMCPMC10498033

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.