ArticleCureus2023
MRI Evaluation of Rectal Cancer Lymph Node Staging Using Apparent Diffusion Coefficient.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Low b-values in apparent diffusion coefficient calculations overestimate diffusion in rectal cancer.Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden) · 2025Observational
- Predictive value of combined DCE-MRI perfusion parameters and clinical features nomogram for microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Colorectal cancer is the third most diagnosed cancer globally. Lymph node metastases significantly affect prognosis, emphasizing the importance of early detection and management. Despite significant advances in conventional MRI's role in staging, improvements in advanced functional imaging such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in identifying lymph node metastases persist. Objectives The aim is to evaluate the effectiveness of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) MRI in evaluating lymph node staging in rectal cancer. Patients and methods In a prospective study, 89 patients with stage II-III rectal cancer were grouped into two treatments: pre-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and standard pre-operative chemoradiotherapy. All underwent 1.5T MRI, with T2-weighted and DWI sequences. A radiologist defined regions of interest on the tumor, lymph nodes, and intact rectal wall to calculate ADC values. Results Rectal cancer ADC's receiver operating characteristic curve had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.688 (P < 0.001), with optimal ADC cutoff at 0.99 x 10-3 mm2/s (sensitivity: 75%, specificity: 83%). For lymph nodes, AUC was 0.508 (P < 0.001), with a cutoff of 0.9 x 10-3 mm2/s (sensitivity: 78%, specificity: 67%). No correlation between tumor and lymph node ADC values was observed. In chemotherapy patients, "healthy" inguinal lymph nodes had higher ADC values than affected ones pre-treatment (P = 0.001), a disparity fading post-treatment (P = 0.313). For chemoradiotherapy patients, the ADC difference persisted pre and post-treatment (P = 0.001). Conclusion The study of ADC-MRI showed different ADC values between tumors and lymph nodes and highlighted ADC differences between treatment groups. Notably, no correlation was observed between tumor and lymph node ADC values. However, differences were apparent when comparing "healthy" inguinal nodes with lymph nodes affected by cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.