ArticlePatient preference and adherence2023
Portrait for Type 2 Diabetes with Goal-Achieved HbA1c Using Digital Diabetes Care Model: A Real-World 12-Month Study from China.
Article in Patient preference and adherence, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Remote Glucose Monitoring Engagement and Glycemic Control in Type 2 Diabetes and Prediabetes: Retrospective Cohort Study.JMIR formative research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Our previous study demonstrated that digital diabetes care model (DDCM) created by multidisciplinary care team (MDCT) can improve glycemic control for patients with diabetes than usual care. Therefore, we aimed to explore long-term glycemic control with DDCM and influencing factors in type 2 diabetic cohort, in order to make a portrait for diabetes with goal-achieved HbA1c in clinics. Methods: A total of 1198 outpatients with type 2 diabetes using DDCM for at least 12 months were recruited as a cohort. Medical records and specific DDCM indexes were collected. The influencing factors for glycemic control were explored by multivariate logistic regression analysis, followed by an internal and external validation. Results: A total of 887 patients were finally included. HbA1c target-achieving rate was increased from 39.83% at baseline to 71.79% after 3-month follow-up. A shorter duration of diabetes, more frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose, lower HbA1c level at baseline, and less frequent emergency out-of-hospital follow-ups were influencing factors for HbA1c <7% at 12-month follow-up. AUC of the prediction model was 0.790, with a sensitivity of 69.7% and specificity of 76.1%. Internal and external validation in patients using the DDCM monitored by MDCT indicated that the DDCM was robust (AUC =0.783 and 0.723, respectively). Conclusion: Our findings made a portrait for T2DM with goal-achieved HbA1c in our DDCM. It is important to recognize associated factors for health providers to make personalized intervention in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.