Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37702809›Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2024

Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a descriptive systematic review.

Richard Sawatzky, Tolulope T Sajobi, Lara Russell, Oluwagbohunmi A Awosoga, Ayoola Ademola, Jan R Böhnke, Oluwaseyi Lawal, Anita Brobbey, Lisa M Lix, Amelie Anota and 4 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Impact of response shift on change in patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Response shift results of quantitative research using patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-regression analysis.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Response shifting: a qualitative meta-synthesis on response shift.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient-reported Outcome Measures in Pediatric Orthopaedics.Journal of the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Richard SawatzkySchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada. rick.sawatzky@twu.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-190X
Tolulope T SajobiDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Lara RussellSchool of Nursing, Trinity Western University, 22500 University Drive, Langley, BC, V2Y 1Y1, Canada.
Oluwagbohunmi A AwosogaFaculty of Health Sciences, University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada.
Ayoola AdemolaDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Jan R BöhnkeSchool of Health Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK.
Oluwaseyi LawalDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Anita BrobbeyDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
Lisa M LixDepartment of Community Health Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Canada.
Amelie AnotaMethodology and Quality of Life Unit in Oncology, University Hospital of Besançon, Besançon, France.
Véronique SebilleINSERM, MethodS in Patient-Centered Outcomes and HEalth ResEarch, SPHERE, Nantes Université, Université de Tours, CHU Nantes, 44000, Nantes, France.
Mirjam A G SprangersMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mathilde G E VerdamMedical Psychology, Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Response Shift – in Sync Working Group

Funding

Canada Research Chairs CRC-2017-00268
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe objective of this systematic review was to describe the prevalence and magnitude of response shift effects, for different response shift methods, populations, study designs, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROM)s.

methodsA literature search was performed in MEDLINE, PSYCINFO, CINAHL, EMBASE, Social Science Citation Index, and Dissertations & Theses Global to identify longitudinal quantitative studies that examined response shift using PROMs, published before 2021. The magnitude of each response shift effect (effect sizes, R-squared or percentage of respondents with response shift) was ascertained based on reported statistical information or as stated in the manuscript. Prevalence and magnitudes of response shift effects were summarized at two levels of analysis (study and effect levels), for recalibration and reprioritization/reconceptualization separately, and for different response shift methods, and population, study design, and PROM characteristics. Analyses were conducted twice: (a) including all studies and samples, and (b) including only unrelated studies and independent samples.

resultsOf the 150 included studies, 130 (86.7%) detected response shift effects. Of the 4868 effects investigated, 793 (16.3%) revealed response shift. Effect sizes could be determined for 105 (70.0%) of the studies for a total of 1130 effects, of which 537 (47.5%) resulted in detection of response shift. Whereas effect sizes varied widely, most median recalibration effect sizes (Cohen's d) were between 0.20 and 0.30 and median reprioritization/reconceptualization effect sizes rarely exceeded 0.15, across the characteristics. Similar results were obtained from unrelated studies.

conclusionThe results draw attention to the need to focus on understanding variability in response shift results: Who experience response shifts, to what extent, and under which circumstances?

Indexed as

Patient Reported Outcome MeasuresHumansQuality of LifeResearch DesignEffect sizesPatient-reported outcomesPrevalenceResponse shiftSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37702809
PMCPMC10850024

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.