ReviewCurrent opinion in genetics & development2023
New perspectives on the causes and consequences of male meiotic drive.
Review in Current opinion in genetics & development, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disruption of small RNAs and mechanistic variation in Segregation Distorter: A sperm-killing drive system in Drosophila melanogaster.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Chromatin state dynamics of autosomes and the B chromosome during spermatogenesis in Pseudococcus viburni.Heredity · 2026Article
- Defective transcription of AAGAG satellite DNA causes sex-ratio meiotic drive in Drosophila.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Defective transcription of AAGAG satellite DNA causes sex-ratio meiotic drive inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Recurrent expansion and rapid evolution of the Drosophilid RNAi pathway in testis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Genetic and environmental influences on the distributions of three chromosomal drive haplotypes in maize.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- A selfish supergene causes meiotic drive through both sexes inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Functional constraints of wtf killer meiotic drivers.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Functional constraints ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Identification of novel genes responsible for a pollen killer present in local natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- Running the gauntlet: challenges to genome integrity in spermiogenesis.Nucleus (Austin, Tex.) · 2024Review
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.Nature plants · 2024Article
- Cleave and Rescue gamete killers create conditions for gene drive in plants.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gametogenesis is vulnerable to selfish genetic elements that bias their transmission to the next generation by cheating meiosis. These so-called meiotic drivers are widespread in plants, animals, and fungi and can impact genome evolution. Here, we summarize recent progress on the causes and consequences of meiotic drive in males, where selfish elements attack vulnerabilities in spermatogenesis. Advances in genomics provide new insights into the organization and dynamics of driving chromosomes in natural populations. Common themes, including small RNAs, gene duplications, and heterochromatin, emerged from these studies. Interdisciplinary approaches combining evolutionary genomics with molecular and cell biology are beginning to unravel the mysteries of drive and suppression mechanisms. These approaches also provide insights into fundamental processes in spermatogenesis and chromatin regulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.