Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37706290›Full record

ArticlePsychological medicine2024

Depression is associated with reduced outcome sensitivity in a dual valence, magnitude learning task.

Erdem Pulcu, Wanjun Lin, Sungwon Han, Michael Browning

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychological medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Erdem PulcuDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2170-0677
Wanjun LinDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sungwon HanNuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michael BrowningDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/N008103/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLearning from rewarded and punished choices is perturbed in depressed patients, suggesting that abnormal reinforcement learning may be a cognitive mechanism of the illness. However, previous studies have disagreed about whether this behavior is produced by alterations in the rate of learning or sensitivity to experienced outcomes. This previous work has generally assessed learning in response to binary outcomes of one valence, rather than to both rewarding and punishing continuous outcomes.

methodsA novel drifting reward and punishment magnitude reinforcement-learning task was administered to patients with current (

resultsOur findings demonstrate that patients with current depression adjust their learning behaviors to a lesser degree in response to trial-by-trial variations in reward and loss magnitudes than the other groups. Computational modeling revealed that this behavioral signature of current depressive state is better accounted for by reduced reward and punishment sensitivity (all

conclusionThese findings suggest that current depression is associated with reduced outcome sensitivity rather than altered learning rate. Previous findings reported in this domain mainly from binary learning tasks seem to generalize to learning from continuous outcomes.

Indexed as

DepressionReinforcement, PsychologyAnhedoniaHumansPunishmentRewardAffective biascomputational modelingdepressionreinforcement learningreward sensitivity

Identifiers

PMID37706290
PMCPMC11443165

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.