Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37708208›Full record

ArticlePloS one2023

Rectal cancer presentation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Are decreasing screening rates leading to an increase in acute presentations?

Tia S Sutton, Scarlett Hao, Mizuki Suzuki, Aimei Chua, Anna Lisa Ciarrocca, Michael D Honaker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tia S SuttonDepartment of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Scarlett HaoDepartment of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Mizuki SuzukiEast Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Aimei ChuaEast Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Anna Lisa CiarroccaEast Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.
Michael D HonakerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, East Carolina University Brody School of Medicine, Greenville, NC, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4574-2094

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nearly 23 million adults ages 50-75 are overdue for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. In March 2020, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid issued guidance that all non-urgent procedures be delayed due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Screening delays may have effects on the presentation of rectal cancer and the natural history of the disease. The aim of this study was to determine if procedural suspension due to the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with an increased proportion of acute presentations or more advanced stage at diagnosis for patients with rectal cancer. We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of adult patients with new or recurrent rectal adenocarcinoma from 2016-2021. We compared patients presenting before (pre-COVID) to those diagnosed after (COVID) March 1, 2020. Of 208 patients diagnosed with rectal cancer, 163 were diagnosed pre-COVID and 45 patients in the COVID group. Cohorts did not differ among age, sex, race, insurance status, marital status, rurality, or BMI. There was no difference in stage at presentation with the majority diagnosed with stage III disease (40.0% vs 33.3%, p = 0.26). Similar proportions of patients presented acutely (67.5% vs 64.4%, p = 0.71). Presenting symptoms were also similar between cohorts. On adjusted analysis, male sex, white race, and uninsured status were found to have significant impact acuity of presentation, while diagnosis before or after the onset of the pandemic remained non-significant (OR 1.25, 95% CI0.57-2.72; p = 0.59). While screening rates have decreased during the COVID pandemic, patients with rectal cancer did not appear to have an increased level of acuity or stage at presentation. These findings could result from the indolent nature of the disease and may change as the pandemic progresses.

Indexed as

COVID-19Rectal NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerHumansMaleMedicarePandemicsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID37708208
PMCPMC10501676

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.