ArticleScientific reports2023
Accelerating the characterization of dynamic DNA origami devices with deep neural networks.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Classifying Multistate DNA Origami: An Automated Approach with Minimal Labeling and Confidence-Based Filtering.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2026Article
- De novo design of DNA origami with a generative diffusion model.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Assisted DNA Origami Shape Sorting Using Fingerprinting Nanosensors and Feature Engineering.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Review
- Characterizing DNA Origami Nanostructures in TEM Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2025Article
- Precise nanoscale fabrication technologies, the "last mile" of medicinal development.Acta pharmaceutica Sinica. B · 2025Review
- AI in SERS sensing moving from discriminative to generative.Npj biosensing · 2025Review
- TriConvUNeXt: A Pure CNN-Based Lightweight Symmetrical Network for Biomedical Image Segmentation.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mechanical characterization of dynamic DNA nanodevices is essential to facilitate their use in applications like molecular diagnostics, force sensing, and nanorobotics that rely on device reconfiguration and interactions with other materials. A common approach to evaluate the mechanical properties of dynamic DNA nanodevices is by quantifying conformational distributions, where the magnitude of fluctuations correlates to the stiffness. This is generally carried out through manual measurement from experimental images, which is a tedious process and a critical bottleneck in the characterization pipeline. While many tools support the analysis of static molecular structures, there is a need for tools to facilitate the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices that undergo large conformational fluctuations. Here, we develop a data processing pipeline based on Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) to address this problem. The YOLOv5 and Resnet50 network architecture were used for the two key subtasks: particle detection and pose (i.e. conformation) estimation. We demonstrate effective network performance (F1 score 0.85 in particle detection) and good agreement with experimental distributions with limited user input and small training sets (~ 5 to 10 images). We also demonstrate this pipeline can be applied to multiple nanodevices, providing a robust approach for the rapid characterization of dynamic DNA devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.