Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37710322›Full record

SynthesisOrphanet journal of rare diseases2023

Incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 and 2: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Tin-Suet Joan Lee, Meera Chopra, Raymond H Kim, Patricia C Parkin, Carolina Barnett-Tapia

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. ReNeu: A Pivotal, Phase IIb Trial of Mirdametinib in Adults and Children With Symptomatic Neurofibromatosis Type 1-Associated Plexiform Neurofibroma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Trial
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tin-Suet Joan Lee *Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Meera Chopra *Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Raymond H KimElisabeth Raab Neurofibromatosis Clinic, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patricia C ParkinInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation. Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Carolina Barnett-TapiaFaculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. c.barnetttapia@utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5546-0221

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo obtain updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) and type 2 (NF2). STUDY

designWe conducted a systematic search of NF1 and NF2 incidence or prevalence studies, in OVID Medline, OVID Embase, Web of Science, and Cinahl. Studies were appraised with the Joanna Briggs Institute Prevalence Critical Appraisal tool. Pooled incidence and prevalence rates were estimated through random-effects meta-analysis.

resultsFrom 1,939 abstracts, 20 studies were fully appraised and 12 were included in the final review. Pooled NF1 prevalence was 1 in 3,164 (95%CI: 1 in 2,132-1 in 4,712). This was higher in studies that screened for NF1, compared to identification of NF1 through medical records (1 in 2,020 and 1 in 4,329, respectively). NF1 pooled birth incidence was 1 in 2,662 (95%CI: 1 in 1,968-1 in 3,601). There were only 2 studies on NF2 prevalence, so data were not pooled. Pooled NF2 birth incidence was 1.08 per 50,000 births (95%CI: 1 in 32,829-1 in 65,019).

conclusionWe present updated estimates of the incidence and prevalence of NF1 and NF2, to help plan for healthcare access and allocation. The prevalence of NF1 from screening studies is higher than from medical record studies, suggesting that the disease may be under recognized. More studies are needed regarding the prevalence of NF2.

Indexed as

Neurofibromatosis 1Health Services AccessibilityHumansIncidenceMedical RecordsPrevalenceIncidence rateNeurofibromatosis 1Neurofibromatosis 2Prevalence rate

Identifiers

PMID37710322
PMCPMC10500831

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.