ArticleAnnals of maxillofacial surgery
A Clinical Study for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar under Local Anaesthesia, with and without Ketamine - A Split Mouth Comparative Study.
Article in Annals of maxillofacial surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between preoperative anxiety, intraoperative discomfort, and postoperative pain across different dental extraction types: a prospective observational study.Journal of dental anesthesia and pain medicine · 2025Article
- Intranasal Dexmedetomidine on Post-operative Pain and Swelling after Third Molar Impaction Surgery - A Comparative Study.Annals of maxillofacial surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Disimpaction is one of the most common operations done by oral and maxillofacial surgeons around the world. Ketamine is a well-known general anaesthetic and short-acting intraoperative analgesic. The aim of this study was to measure the efficacy of anaesthesia using combined treatment with local anaesthetic plus a subanaesthetic dose of ketamine and local anaesthetic alone in bilaterally impacted mandibular third molar surgery. Methods and Materials: A total of 24 patients who consented were taken up for a split-mouth study. In the control group, surgical extraction of the impacted lower third molar was done using local anaesthesia (lignocaine 2% with 1:80,000 adrenaline) only, and in the study group, local anaesthesia with ketamine extraction was done using ketamine (0.2 mg/kg) along with local anaesthesia (LA). The time of onset and the duration of anaesthesia intraoperatively were recorded using a digital stopwatch. The depth of anaesthesia was noted on the 10 Results: A statistically significant ( Discussion: Ketamine can be used as a viable option for surgical third molar extractions with reduced discomfort and post-operative pain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.