ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2023
Update of the risk assessment of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Agricultural By-Products as Secondary Risk Matrices: Hazard Occurrence, Contaminant Fate, Mitigation Strategies, and Regulatory Considerations in Food Systems.Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety · 2026Review
- Untargeted approaches based on GC-Orbitrap-HRMS and two-dimensional GC-MS for the identification of intentionally and non-intentionally added substances from bio-based food contact materials.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Mineral Oils in Olive Oils: Background, Analytical Determination, Sources of Contamination, and Possible Mitigation Strategies.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- High-Throughput Testing for Unknown Mutagens and Cytotoxica via Duplex Planar Ames-Cytotoxicity Bioassay Including Metabolic S9 Activation.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance paraffin oil (CAS 72623-86-0, chain lengths CEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Feasibility Study of MOS Gas Sensors for Detecting Mineral Hydrocarbon Contaminants in Freshly Harvested Olives at Different Maturity Stages.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Discrepancies in Mineral Oil Confirmation by Two-Dimensional Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: A Call for Harmonization.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Fin Whale as a Sink of Legacy and Emerging Contaminants: First Integrated Chemical Exposomics and Gene Expression Analysis in Cetaceans.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance paraffin oil (CAS 8042-47-5, chain lengths CEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Review
- A Study on Mineral Oil Hydrocarbons (MOH) Contamination in Pig Diets and Its Transfer to Back Fat and Loin Tissues.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Update of the risk assessment of mineral oil hydrocarbons in food.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Investigation of potential migratables from paper and board food contact materials.Frontiers in chemistry · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mineral oil hydrocarbons (MOH) are composed of saturated hydrocarbons (MOSH) and aromatic hydrocarbons (MOAH). Due to the complexity of the MOH composition, their complete chemical characterisation is not possible. MOSH accumulation is observed in various tissues, with species-specific differences. Formation of liver epithelioid lipogranulomas and inflammation, as well as increased liver and spleen weights, are observed in Fischer 344 (F344) rats, but not in Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats. These effects are related to specific accumulation of wax components in the liver of F344 rats, which is not observed in SD rats or humans. The CONTAM Panel concluded that F344 rats are not an appropriate model for effects of MOSH with wax components. A NOAEL of 236 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day, corresponding to the highest tested dose in F344 rats of a white mineral oil product virtually free of wax components, was selected as relevant reference point (RP). The highest dietary exposure to MOSH was estimated for the young population, with lower bound-upper bound (LB-UB) means and 95th percentiles of 0.085-0.126 and 0.157-0.212 mg/kg bw per day, respectively. Considering a margin of exposure approach, the Panel concluded that the present dietary exposure to MOSH does not raise concern for human health for all age classes. Genotoxicity and carcinogenicity are associated with MOAH with three or more aromatic rings. For this subfraction, a surrogate RP of 0.49 mg/kg bw per day, calculated from data on eight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, was considered. The highest dietary exposure to MOAH was also in the young population, with LB-UB mean and 95th percentile estimations of 0.003-0.031 and 0.011-0.059 mg/kg bw per day, respectively. Based on two scenarios on three or more ring MOAH contents in the diet and lacking toxicological information on effects of 1 and 2 ring MOAH, a possible concern for human health was raised.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.