ArticleClinical parkinsonism & related disorders2023
Social cognition in cervical dystonia.
Article in Clinical parkinsonism & related disorders, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social cognition in idiopathic focal dystonia: preliminary evidence on its relationship with cognitive and affective-behavioral functioning.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2026Article
- Multidimensional Phenotyping and Predictive Neuropsychological Modeling of Socio-Cognitive Endophenotypes in Early Parkinson's Disease.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Neck and mind: exploring emotion processing in cervical dystonia.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Whilst traditionally considered a movement disorder, it is now generally accepted that cervical dystonia (CD) presents with additional non-motor symptoms which significantly impact quality of life. Our study primarily aimed to explore social cognition and levels of psychological distress in individuals with CD, in comparison to age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Methods: 20 participants with CD attending a specialist movement disorders clinic were recruited. 20 age and sex matched neurologically healthy controls were recruited in parallel. Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and two novel social cognition tasks: The Cambridge Mindreading Face-Voice Battery (CAFMB) and the Edinburgh Social Cognition Test (ESCoT). Results: Participants with CD exhibited poorer complex emotion recognition abilities for visual and auditory stimuli, compared to controls on the CAFMB task. Participants with CD did not differ significantly from controls on performance on cognitive or affective Theory of Mind tasks, or interpersonal or intrapersonal understanding of social norms, as measured by the ESCoT. The proportion of depressive symptoms was significantly higher for participants with CD than controls. 40% of participants with CD reported clinically elevated depressive symptoms, and 60% reported clinically elevated anxiety. Poorer understanding of emotional facial expressions was associated with higher levels of depression in the CD group. Conclusions: Significant between-group differences between participants with CD and controls suggests socio-cognitive dysfunction is an important aspect of the non-motor syndrome of CD. Findings highlight the need for assessment of and intervention for both social cognitive difficulties and psychological distress in individuals with CD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.