Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719274›Full record

ArticleHorticulture research2023

Grapevine plantlets respond to different monochromatic lights by tuning photosynthesis and carbon allocation.

Menglong Liu, Yan Zhao, Peige Fan, Junhua Kong, Yongjian Wang, Xiaobo Xu, Meilong Xu, Lijun Wang, Shaohua Li, Zhenchang Liang and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Horticulture research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Menglong LiuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Yan ZhaoState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Peige FanState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Junhua KongState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Yongjian WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Xiaobo XuState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Meilong XuNingxia Horticulture Research Institute, Ningxia Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Yinchuan 750002, China.
Lijun WangState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Shaohua LiState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Zhenchang LiangState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Wei DuanState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.
Zhanwu DaiState Key Laboratory of Plant Diversity and Specialty Crops, Beijing Key Laboratory of Grape Sciences and Enology, Institute of Botany, The Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, 100093, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7625-8337

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The quality of planting materials is the foundation for productivity, longevity, and berry quality of perennial grapevines with a long lifespan. Manipulating the nursery light spectrum may speed up the production of healthy and high-quality planting vines but the underlying mechanisms remain elusive. Herein, the effects of different monochromatic lights (green, blue, and red) on grapevine growth, leaf photosynthesis, whole-plant carbon allocation, and transcriptome reprograming were investigated with white light as control. Results showed that blue and red lights were favorable for plantlet growth in comparison with white light. Blue light repressed excessive growth, significantly increased the maximum net photosynthetic rate (Pn) of leaves by 39.58% and leaf specific weight by 38.29%. Red light increased the dry weight of the stem by 53.60%, the starch content of the leaf by 53.63%, and the sucrose content of the stem by 230%. Green light reduced all photosynthetic indexes of the grape plantlet. Photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD)/Ci-Pn curves indicated that blue light affected photosynthetic rate depending on the light intensity and CO

Identifiers

PMID37719274
PMCPMC10500148

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.