Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37719545›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Exploring the Challenges and Opportunities for Female Medical Students Engaged in Research in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.

Emily Wilson, Reem Elmokattaf, Roaa Aljumaa, Ghada Almasri, Maryam T Altayeb, Muhammad Sajid

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Emily WilsonEnglish Department, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Reem ElmokattafCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Roaa AljumaaCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Ghada AlmasriCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Maryam T AltayebCollege of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.
Muhammad SajidPathology Department, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, SAU.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While researchers have made great strides in expanding opportunities for women in medical research, some gender imbalance persists, particularly in the context of the Arab world. The purpose of our study was to discover obstacles that female medical students have faced in conducting research. We conducted our study at a small private university in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, and we used a qualitative, feminist methodology. In April 2022, we collected data from four group interviews with 21 female undergraduate medical students who had experience participating in research projects. The study's aim was to elicit participants' perspectives on the barriers women face when conducting medical research through all phases of the research process, including expressing interest in a particular field, finding faculty support, performing research activities, and assessing research outcomes. The inductive thematic framework data analysis revealed three major themes expressed by participants: differing expectations for female students versus male students in conducting research; challenges for female students in securing research opportunities; and practical challenges for female students in conducting research. Findings from this study suggest that targeted interventions such as mentorship programs can help female students overcome obstacles and work toward equal participation of female and male students in medical research.

Indexed as

feminist methodologygenderqualitative studyresearchsaudi arabiastudent perceptionwomen

Identifiers

PMID37719545
PMCPMC10504447

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.