Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37720353›Full record

ReviewExploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy2023

Emerging role of quantitative imaging (radiomics) and artificial intelligence in precision oncology.

Ashish Kumar Jha, Sneha Mithun, Umeshkumar B Sherkhane, Pooj Dwivedi, Senders Puts, Biche Osong, Alberto Traverso, Nilendu Purandare, Leonard Wee, Venkatesh Rangarajan and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Breast Imaging Physics in Mammography (Part II).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  12. Breast Imaging Physics in Mammography (Part I).Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ashish Kumar JhaDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5998-3206
Sneha MithunDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9424-2726
Umeshkumar B SherkhaneDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Pooj DwivediHomi Bhabha National Institute, BARC Training School Complex, Anushaktinagar, Mumbai 400094, Maharashtra, India.
Senders PutsDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Biche OsongDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Alberto TraversoDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6183-4429
Nilendu PurandareDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.
Leonard WeeDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1612-9055
Venkatesh RangarajanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai 400012, Maharashtra, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2581-3086
Andre DekkerDepartment of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, 6200 Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0422-7996

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cancer is a fatal disease and the second most cause of death worldwide. Treatment of cancer is a complex process and requires a multi-modality-based approach. Cancer detection and treatment starts with screening/diagnosis and continues till the patient is alive. Screening/diagnosis of the disease is the beginning of cancer management and continued with the staging of the disease, planning and delivery of treatment, treatment monitoring, and ongoing monitoring and follow-up. Imaging plays an important role in all stages of cancer management. Conventional oncology practice considers that all patients are similar in a disease type, whereas biomarkers subgroup the patients in a disease type which leads to the development of precision oncology. The utilization of the radiomic process has facilitated the advancement of diverse imaging biomarkers that find application in precision oncology. The role of imaging biomarkers and artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology has been investigated by many researchers in the past. The existing literature is suggestive of the increasing role of imaging biomarkers and AI in oncology. However, the stability of radiomic features has also been questioned. The radiomic community has recognized that the instability of radiomic features poses a danger to the global generalization of radiomic-based prediction models. In order to establish radiomic-based imaging biomarkers in oncology, the robustness of radiomic features needs to be established on a priority basis. This is because radiomic models developed in one institution frequently perform poorly in other institutions, most likely due to radiomic feature instability. To generalize radiomic-based prediction models in oncology, a number of initiatives, including Quantitative Imaging Network (QIN), Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA), and Image Biomarker Standardisation Initiative (IBSI), have been launched to stabilize the radiomic features.

Indexed as

artificial intelligenceimaging biomarkersPrecision oncologyradiomics

Identifiers

PMID37720353
PMCPMC10501896

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.