Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37722510›Full record

ArticleBehavioural brain research2023

Comparison of three DREADD agonists acting on Gq-DREADDs in the ventral tegmental area to alter locomotor activity in tyrosine hydroxylase:Cre male and female rats.

Hannah L Robinson, Katherine L Nicholson, Keith L Shelton, Peter J Hamilton, Matthew L Banks

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioural brain research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. The role of the prelimbic cortex to nucleus accumbens core projection in the reinstatement of cocaine-seeking after cocaine-alcohol polysubstance use.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Clozapine is responsible for theFrontiers in pharmacology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hannah L RobinsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Katherine L NicholsonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Keith L SheltonDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Peter J HamiltonDepartment of Anatomy and Neurobiology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
Matthew L BanksDepartment of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA. Electronic address: mbanks7@vcu.edu.
Virginia Commonwealth University · US

Funding

Virus Vector Shared ResourceP30CA016059 · NCI · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI Renato Martins · 1985 to 2026
$51.0M
TRAINING IN THE PHARMACOLOGY OF ABUSED DRUGST32DA007027 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI William L. Dewey · 1985 to 2026
$14.7M
VCU Center for Drug Addiction ResearchP30DA033934 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI JOLENE J WINDLE · 2014 to 2026
$13.8M
DREADD Manipulations of Drug ChoiceR36DA057546 · NIDA · VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY · PI ROBINSON, HANNAH · 2023 to 2023
$42k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016059NIDA NIH HHS P30 DA033934NIDA NIH HHS R36 DA057546NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007027
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleDespite the increasingly pervasive use of chemogenetic tools in preclinical neuroscience research, the in vivo pharmacology of DREADD agonists remains poorly understood. The pharmacological effects of any ligand acting at receptors, engineered or endogenous, are influenced by numerous factors including potency, time course, and receptor selectivity. Thus, rigorous comparison of the potency and time course of available DREADD ligands may provide an empirical foundation for ligand selection.

objectivesCompare the behavioral pharmacology of three different DREADD ligands clozapine-N-oxide (CNO), compound 21 (C21), and deschloroclozapine (DCZ) in a locomotor activity assay in tyrosine hydroxylase:cre recombinase (TH:Cre) male and female rats.

methodsLocomotor activity in nine adult TH:Cre Sprague-Dawley rats (5 female, 4 male) was monitored for two hours following administration of d-amphetamine (vehicle, 0.1-3.2 mg/kg, IP), DCZ (vehicle, 0.32-320 µg/kg, IP), CNO (vehicle, 0.32-10 mg/kg), and C21 (vehicle, 0.1-3.2 mg/kg, IP). Behavioral sessions were conducted twice per week prior to and starting three weeks after bilateral intra-VTA hM3Dq DREADD virus injection.

resultsd-Amphetamine significantly increased locomotor activity pre- and post-DREADD virus injection. DCZ, CNO, and C21 did not alter locomotor activity pre-DREADD virus injection. There was no significant effect of DCZ, CNO, and C21 on locomotor activity post-DREADD virus injection; however, large individual differences in both behavioral response and receptor expression were observed.

conclusionsLarge individual variability was observed in both DREADD agonist behavioral effects and receptor expression. These results suggest further basic research would facilitate the utility of these chemogenetic tools for behavioral neuroscience research.

Indexed as

ClozapineImidazolesSulfonamidesThiophenesVentral Tegmental AreaAnimalsDextroamphetamineFemaleLigandsLocomotionMaleRatsRats, Sprague-DawleyTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseClozapinecompound 21deschloroclozapineDextroamphetamineImidazolesLigandsSulfonamidesThiophenesTyrosine 3-MonooxygenaseClozapine N-oxideCompound 21DeschloroclozapineDREADDLocomotor activityTH:Cre rats

Identifiers

PMID37722510
PMCPMC10918529
OpenAlexW4386800301

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.