Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37722749›Full record

SynthesisAnnual review of psychology2024

A Systematic Review of Implementation Research on Determinants and Strategies of Effective HIV Interventions for Men Who Have Sex with Men in the United States.

Brian Mustanski, Artur Queiroz, James L Merle, Alithia Zamantakis, Juan Pablo Zapata, Dennis H Li, Nanette Benbow, Maria Pyra, Justin D Smith

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annual review of psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Effectiveness of the smart program: Stepped-care HIV prevention for gay and bisexual adolescent boys.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2025
    Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian MustanskiInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
Artur QueirozInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
James L MerleDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Alithia ZamantakisInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
Juan Pablo ZapataInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
Dennis H LiInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
Nanette BenbowThird Coast Center for AIDS Research, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Maria PyraInstitute for Sexual and Gender Minority Health and Wellbeing, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA; email: brian@northwestern.edu.
Justin D SmithDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Spencer Fox Eccles School of Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.

Funding

Virology and Immunology Technology CoreP30AI117943 · NIAID · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Kathryn Rose Macapagal · 2015 to 2026
$38.4M
UNIVERSITY OF UTAH MEDICAL INFORMATICS TRAININGT15LM007124 · NLM · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Karen Louise Eilbeck · 1997 to 2026
$22.0M
Training Program in Translational Science, HIV, and Sexual and Gender Minority HealthT32MH130325 · NIMH · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Michael E Newcomb · 2022 to 2026
$1.6M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI117943NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH130325NLM NIH HHS T15 LM007124
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Men who have sex with men (MSM) are disproportionately affected by HIV, accounting for two-thirds of HIV cases in the United States despite representing ∼5% of the adult population. Delivery and use of existing and highly effective HIV prevention and treatment strategies remain suboptimal among MSM. To summarize the state of the science, we systematically review implementation determinants and strategies of HIV-related health interventions using implementation science frameworks. Research on implementation barriers has focused predominantly on characteristics of individual recipients (e.g., ethnicity, age, drug use) and less so on deliverers (e.g., nurses, physicians), with little focus on system-level factors. Similarly, most strategies target recipients to influence their uptake and adherence, rather than improving and supporting implementation systems. HIV implementation research is burgeoning; future research is needed to broaden the examination of barriers at the provider and system levels, as well as expand knowledge on how to match strategies to barriers-particularly to address stigma. Collaboration and coordination among federal, state, and local public health agencies; community-based organizations; health care providers; and scientists are important for successful implementation of HIV-related health innovations.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultHomosexuality, MaleHumansMaleSocial StigmaUnited StatesHIVHIV testingimplementation sciencelinkage-to-caremen who have sex with menpreexposure prophylaxis

Identifiers

PMID37722749
PMCPMC10872355

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.