Observational studyNeurocritical care2024
Interaction of Optimal Cerebral Perfusion Pressure with Early Brain Injury and its Impact on Ischemic Complications and Outcome Following Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Observational study in Neurocritical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Invasive Monitoring of Cerebral Autoregulation in Aneurysmal Subarachnoid and Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- A Longitudinal Imaging and Clinical Data Workflow Identifies Potential Time-Dependent Risk Factors for Post-Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Epilepsy.Neurocritical care · 2026Article
- Impact of intracranial pressure and related parameters on prognosis in patients undergoing surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms.Neurosurgical review · 2025Article
- Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCerebral autoregulation is impaired early on after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). The study objective was to explore the pressure reactivity index (PRx) and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) in the earliest phase after aneurysm rupture and to address the question of whether an optimal CPP (CPPopt)-targeted management is associated with less severe early brain injury (EBI).
methodsPatients with aSAH admitted between 2012 and 2020 were retrospectively included in this observational cohort study. The PRx was calculated as a correlation coefficient between intracranial pressure and mean arterial pressure. By plotting the PRx versus CPP, CPP correlating the lowest PRx value was identified as CPPopt. EBI was assessed by applying the Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Early Brain Edema Score (SEBES) on day 3 after ictus. An SEBES ≥ 3 was considered severe EBI.
resultsIn 90 of 324 consecutive patients with aSAH, intracranial pressure monitoring was performed ≥ 7 days, allowing for PRx calculation and CPPopt determination. Severe EBI was associated with larger mean deviation of CPP from CPPopt 72 h after ictus (r = 0.22, p = 0.03). Progressive edema requiring decompressive hemicraniectomy was associated with larger deviation of CPP from CPPopt on day 2 (r = 0.23, p = 0.02). The higher the difference of CPP from CPPopt on day 3 the higher the mortality rate (r = 0.31, p = 0.04).
conclusionsPatients with CPP near to the calculated CPPopt in the early phase after aSAH experienced less severe EBI, less frequently received decompressive hemicraniectomy, and exhibited a lower mortality rate. A prospective evaluation of CPPopt-guided management starting in the first days after ictus is needed to confirm the clinical validity of this concept.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.