Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37728750›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2024

Patient phenotype profiling using echocardiography and natriuretic peptides to personalise heart failure therapy.

Frank L Dini, Erberto Carluccio, Stefano Ghio, Nicola Riccardo Pugliese, Giangiacomo Galeotti, Michele Correale, Matteo Beltrami, Carlo Gabriele Tocchetti, Valentina Mercurio, Stefania Paolillo and 2 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Frank L DiniIstituto Auxologico IRCCS, Centro Medico Sant'Agostino, Via Temperanza, 6, 20127, Milan, Italy. frank.dini@santagostino.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1458-4820
Erberto CarluccioCardiology and Cardiovascular Pathophysiology, Santa Maria della Misericordia, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy.
Stefano GhioCardiology Division, Fondazione IRCCS, Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy.
Nicola Riccardo PuglieseDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Giangiacomo GaleottiCardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Department, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy.
Michele CorrealeDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Policlinico, Riuniti, Foggia, Italy.
Matteo BeltramiCardiology Unit, San Giovanni di Dio Hospital, Azienda USL Toscana Centro, Florence, Italy.
Carlo Gabriele TocchettiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences (DISMET), Center for Basic and Clinical Immunology Research (CISI), Interdepartmental Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences (CIRCET), Interdepartmental Hypertension Research Center (CIRIAPA), Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Valentina MercurioDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences (DISMET), Interdepartmental Center of Clinical and Translational Sciences (CIRCET), Interdepartmental Hypertension Research Center (CIRIAPA), Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Stefania PaolilloDepartment of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, Section of Cardiology, Federico II University, Naples, Italy.
Alberto PalazzuoliCardiovascular Diseases Unit, Cardio-thoracic and vascular Department, S. Maria alle Scotte Hospital, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
Heart Failure Study Group of the Italian Society of Cardiology
Federico II University Hospital · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITAzienda Usl Toscana Centro · ITIRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano · ITOspedali Riuniti di Foggia · ITPoliclinico San Matteo Fondazione · ITUniversity of Perugia · ITUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Heart failure (HF) is a progressive condition with a clinical picture resulting from reduced cardiac output (CO) and/or elevated left ventricular (LV) filling pressures (LVFP). The original Diamond-Forrester classification, based on haemodynamic data reflecting CO and pulmonary congestion, was introduced to grade severity, manage, and risk stratify advanced HF patients, providing evidence that survival progressively worsened for those classified as warm/dry, cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet. Invasive haemodynamic evaluation in critically ill patients has been replaced by non-invasive haemodynamic phenotype profiling using echocardiography. Decreased CO is not infrequent among ambulatory HF patients with reduced ejection fraction, ranging from 23 to 45%. The Diamond-Forrester classification may be used in combination with the evaluation of natriuretic peptides (NPs) in ambulatory HF patients to pursue the goal of early identification of those at high risk of adverse events and personalise therapy to antagonise neurohormonal systems, reduce congestion, and preserve tissue/renal perfusion. The most benefit of the Guideline-directed medical treatment is to be expected in stable patients with the warm/dry profile, who more often respond with LV reverse remodelling, while more selective individualised treatments guided by echocardiography and NPs are necessary for patients with persisting congestion and/or tissue/renal hypoperfusion (cold/dry, warm/wet, and cold/wet phenotypes) to achieve stabilization and to avoid further neurohormonal activation, as a result of inappropriate use of vasodilating or negative chronotropic drugs, thus pursuing the therapeutic objectives. Therefore, tracking the haemodynamic status over time by clinical, imaging, and laboratory indicators helps implement therapy by individualising drug regimens and interventions according to patients' phenotypes even in an ambulatory setting.

Indexed as

EchocardiographyHeart FailureHemodynamicsHumansNatriuretic PeptidesPhenotypeStroke VolumeNatriuretic PeptidesEchocardiographyHeart failureNatriuretic peptidesTherapy

Identifiers

PMID37728750
OpenAlexW4386877982

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.