ArticleGenomics2023
Donor white blood cell differential is the single largest determinant of whole blood gene expression patterns.
Article in Genomics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of Potential Candidate Dwarf Genes in Maize by BSA-Seq and Transcriptomic Analyses.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- COLGALT2 Polymorphisms are Associated with Osteoarthritis Risk and Clinical Severity in a Chinese Population.International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
- Comparative Blood-Based Transcriptomic Profiles of Prostate Cancer Patients from South Africa and the USA: A Cross-Sectional Pilot Study.Journal of Cancer · 2026Article
- Dataset including whole blood gene expression profiles and matched leukocyte counts with utility for benchmarking cellular deconvolution pipelines.BMC genomic data · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
It has become widely accepted that sample cellular composition is a significant determinant of the gene expression patterns observed in any transcriptomic experiment performed with bulk tissue. Despite this, many investigations currently performed with whole blood do not experimentally account for possible inter-specimen differences in cellularity, and often assume that any observed gene expression differences are a result of true differences in nuclear transcription. In order to determine how confounding of an assumption this may be, in this study, we recruited a large cohort of human donors (n = 138) and used a combination of next generation sequencing and flow cytometry to quantify and compare the underlying contributions of variance in leukocyte counts versus variance in other biological factors to overall variance in whole blood transcript levels. Our results suggest that the combination of donor neutrophil and lymphocyte counts alone are the primary determinants of whole blood transcript levels for up to 75% of the protein-coding genes expressed in peripheral circulation, whereas the other factors such as age, sex, race, ethnicity, and common disease states have comparatively minimal influence. Broadly, this infers that a majority of gene expression differences observed in experiments performed with whole blood are driven by latent differences in leukocyte counts, and that cell count heterogeneity must be accounted for to meaningfully biologically interpret the results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.