Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730271›Full record

ArticleJournal for immunotherapy of cancer2023

Responses of patients with cancer to mRNA vaccines depend on the time interval between vaccination and last treatment.

Lara Victoria Donhauser, Julia Veloso de Oliveira, Cordula Schick, Wenzel Manlik, Sabrina Styblova, Sarah Lutzenberger, Michael Aigner, Patrick Philipp, Sebastian Robert, Beate Gandorfer and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal for immunotherapy of cancer, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Cancer and COVID-19: A review of immune insights and partnerships to inform public health strategy.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Lara Victoria DonhauserDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7690-7501
Julia Veloso de OliveiraDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Cordula SchickMVZ Laboratory, Freising, Germany.
Wenzel ManlikDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Sabrina StyblovaDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Sarah LutzenbergerDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.ORCID 0009-0003-4058-1348
Michael AignerDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany.
Patrick PhilippSystem Technologies and Image Exploitation IOSB, Fraunhofer Institute of Optronics, Karlsruhe, Germany.
Sebastian RobertDivision of Applied Health and Social Sciences, Technical University of Applied Sciences, Rosenheim, Germany.
Beate GandorferMVZ Laboratory, Freising, Germany.
Dirk HempelOncological Center Donauwörth, Donauwörth, Germany dietmar.zehn@tum.de Louisa.hempel@sfu.ac.at dirk.hempel@gmail.com.
Louisa HempelSigmund Freud Medical University, Vienna, Austria dietmar.zehn@tum.de Louisa.hempel@sfu.ac.at dirk.hempel@gmail.com.
Dietmar ZehnDivision of Animal Physiology and Immunology, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany dietmar.zehn@tum.de Louisa.hempel@sfu.ac.at dirk.hempel@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersonalized mRNA vaccines are promising new therapeutic options for patients with cancer. Because mRNA vaccines are not yet approved for first-line therapy, the vaccines are presently applied to individuals that received prior therapies that can have immunocompromising effects. There is a need to address how prior treatments impact mRNA vaccine outcomes.

methodTherefore, we analyzed the response to BioNTech/Pfizer's anti-SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in 237 oncology outpatients, which cover a broad spectrum of hematologic malignancies and solid tumors and a variety of treatments. Patients were stratified by the time interval between the last treatment and first vaccination and by the presence or absence of florid tumors and IgG titers and T cell responses were analyzed 14 days after the second vaccination.

resultsRegardless of the last treatment time point, our data indicate that vaccination responses in patients with checkpoint inhibition were comparable to healthy controls. In contrast, patients after chemotherapy or cortisone therapy did not develop an immune response until 6 months after the last systemic therapy and patients after Cht-immune checkpoint inhibitor and tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy only after 12 months.

conclusionAccordingly, our data support that timing of mRNA-based therapy is critical and we suggest that at least a 6-months or 12-months waiting interval should be observed before mRNA vaccination in systemically treated patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Hematologic NeoplasmsNeoplasmsHumansMedical OncologyVaccinationAdaptive ImmunityAntibody FormationImmunity, CellularImmunogenicity, VaccineImmunomodulation

Identifiers

PMID37730271
PMCPMC10510941

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.