Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37730747›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Predicting 'Brainage' in late childhood to adolescence (6-17yrs) using structural MRI, morphometric similarity, and machine learning.

Daniel Griffiths-King, Amanda G Wood, Jan Novak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel Griffiths-KingAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Amanda G WoodAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Jan NovakAston Institute of Health and Neurodevelopment, College of Health and Life Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. j.novak@aston.ac.uk.
Aston University · GBDeakin University · AU

Funding

Translational Developmental Neuroscience of AutismK23MH087770 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE · PI DI MARTINO, ADRIANA · 2010 to 2013
$644k
Enhancement of the 1000 Functional Connectome ProjectR03MH096321 · NIMH · NATHAN S. KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCH RES · PI BISWAL, BHARAT BHUSAN, MILHAM, MICHAEL PETER · 2012 to 2013
$158k
NIMH NIH HHS K23 MH087770NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH096321
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Brain development is regularly studied using structural MRI. Recently, studies have used a combination of statistical learning and large-scale imaging databases of healthy children to predict an individual's age from structural MRI. This data-driven, predicted 'Brainage' typically differs from the subjects chronological age, with this difference a potential measure of individual difference. Few studies have leveraged higher-order or connectomic representations of structural MRI data for this Brainage approach. We leveraged morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI to generate predictive models of age. We benchmarked these novel Brainage approaches using morphometric similarity against more typical, single feature (i.e., cortical thickness) approaches. We showed that these novel methods did not outperform cortical thickness or cortical volume measures. All models were significantly biased by age, but robust to motion confounds. The main results show that, whilst morphometric similarity mapping may be a novel way to leverage additional information from a T1-weighted structural MRI beyond individual features, in the context of a Brainage framework, morphometric similarity does not provide more accurate predictions of age. Morphometric similarity as a network-level approach to structural MRI may be poorly positioned to study individual differences in brain development in healthy participants in this way.

Indexed as

Machine LearningMagnetic Resonance ImagingAdolescentBenchmarkingChildDatabases, FactualHealthy VolunteersHumans

Identifiers

PMID37730747
PMCPMC10511546
OpenAlexW4386896787

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.