Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37733427›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2023

Development and Integration of Machine Learning Algorithm to Identify Peripheral Arterial Disease: Multistakeholder Qualitative Study.

Sabrina M Wang, H D Jeffry Hogg, Devdutta Sangvai, Manesh R Patel, E Hope Weissler, Katherine C Kellogg, William Ratliff, Suresh Balu, Mark Sendak

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Machine Learning Operations in Health Care: A Scoping Review.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Digital health · 2024
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sabrina M WangDuke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9225-585X
H D Jeffry HoggPopulation Health Science Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8044-7790
Devdutta SangvaiPopulation Health Management, Duke Health, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8248-8534
Manesh R PatelDepartment of Cardiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2393-0855
E Hope WeisslerDepartment of Vascular Surgery, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8442-6150
Katherine C KelloggMIT Sloan School of Management, Cambridge, MA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4372-3498
William RatliffDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4015-3805
Suresh BaluDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4929-9130
Mark SendakDuke Institute for Health Innovation, Durham, NC, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5828-4497
Duke Institute for Health Innovation · USDuke University · USDuke University Health System · USRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMachine learning (ML)-driven clinical decision support (CDS) continues to draw wide interest and investment as a means of improving care quality and value, despite mixed real-world implementation outcomes.

objectiveThis study aimed to explore the factors that influence the integration of a peripheral arterial disease (PAD) identification algorithm to implement timely guideline-based care.

methodsA total of 12 semistructured interviews were conducted with individuals from 3 stakeholder groups during the first 4 weeks of integration of an ML-driven CDS. The stakeholder groups included technical, administrative, and clinical members of the team interacting with the ML-driven CDS. The ML-driven CDS identified patients with a high probability of having PAD, and these patients were then reviewed by an interdisciplinary team that developed a recommended action plan and sent recommendations to the patient's primary care provider. Pseudonymized transcripts were coded, and thematic analysis was conducted by a multidisciplinary research team.

resultsThree themes were identified: positive factors translating in silico performance to real-world efficacy, organizational factors and data structure factors affecting clinical impact, and potential challenges to advancing equity. Our study found that the factors that led to successful translation of in silico algorithm performance to real-world impact were largely nontechnical, given adequate efficacy in retrospective validation, including strong clinical leadership, trustworthy workflows, early consideration of end-user needs, and ensuring that the CDS addresses an actionable problem. Negative factors of integration included failure to incorporate the on-the-ground context, the lack of feedback loops, and data silos limiting the ML-driven CDS. The success criteria for each stakeholder group were also characterized to better understand how teams work together to integrate ML-driven CDS and to understand the varying needs across stakeholder groups.

conclusionsLongitudinal and multidisciplinary stakeholder engagement in the development and integration of ML-driven CDS underpins its effective translation into real-world care. Although previous studies have focused on the technical elements of ML-driven CDS, our study demonstrates the importance of including administrative and operational leaders as well as an early consideration of clinicians' needs. Seeing how different stakeholder groups have this more holistic perspective also permits more effective detection of context-driven health care inequities, which are uncovered or exacerbated via ML-driven CDS integration through structural and organizational challenges. Many of the solutions to these inequities lie outside the scope of ML and require coordinated systematic solutions for mitigation to help reduce disparities in the care of patients with PAD.

Indexed as

algorithmbarrierclinicaldetectiondevelopmentefficacyengagementimplementationintegrationmachine learningperipheral arterial diseasequalitystructuresupporttranslation

Identifiers

PMID37733427
PMCPMC10557008
OpenAlexW4367592794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.