Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37735356›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2023

Multi-omics insights into the positive role of strigolactone perception in barley drought response.

Agata Daszkowska-Golec, Devang Mehta, R Glen Uhrig, Agnieszka Brąszewska, Ondrej Novak, Irene M Fontana, Michael Melzer, Tomasz Płociniczak, Marek Marzec

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 5 countries.

Agata Daszkowska-GolecInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9479-0813
Devang MehtaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8911-1174
R Glen UhrigDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, 11455 Saskatchewan Drive, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2773-4381
Agnieszka BrąszewskaInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0997-8753
Ondrej NovakLaboratory of Growth Regulators, Faculty of Science, Palacký University & Institute of Experimental Botany, The Czech Academy of Sciences, Olomouc, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3452-0154
Irene M FontanaLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Seeland, 06466, Gatersleben, OT, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7411-601X
Michael MelzerLeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), Gatersleben, Seeland, 06466, Gatersleben, OT, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-4030
Tomasz PłociniczakInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9594-4378
Marek MarzecInstitute of Biology, Biotechnology and Environmental Protection, Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Silesia in Katowice, Jagiellonska 28, 40-032, Katowice, Poland. marek.marzec@us.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5261-6662
University of Silesia in Katowice · PLLeibniz-Institut für Pflanzengenetik und Kulturpflanzenforschung (IPK) · DEUniversity of Alberta · CACzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Experimental Botany · CZ

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft ME 3356/7-1Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2018/31/F/NZ2/03848
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrought is a major environmental stress that affects crop productivity worldwide. Although previous research demonstrated links between strigolactones (SLs) and drought, here we used barley (Hordeum vulgare) SL-insensitive mutant hvd14 (dwarf14) to scrutinize the SL-dependent mechanisms associated with water deficit response.

resultsWe have employed a combination of transcriptomics, proteomics, phytohormonomics analyses, and physiological data to unravel differences between wild-type and hvd14 plants under drought. Our research revealed that drought sensitivity of hvd14 is related to weaker induction of abscisic acid-responsive genes/proteins, lower jasmonic acid content, higher reactive oxygen species content, and lower wax biosynthetic and deposition mechanisms than wild-type plants. In addition, we identified a set of transcription factors (TFs) that are exclusively drought-induced in the wild-type barley.

conclusionsCritically, we resolved a comprehensive series of interactions between the drought-induced barley transcriptome and proteome responses, allowing us to understand the profound effects of SLs in alleviating water-limiting conditions. Several new avenues have opened for developing barley more resilient to drought through the information provided. Moreover, our study contributes to a better understanding of the complex interplay between genes, proteins, and hormones in response to drought, and underscores the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to studying plant stress response mechanisms.

Indexed as

HordeumDroughtsHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLactonesMultiomicsPerceptionGR24 strigolactoneHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingLactonesAbscisic acidBarley (Hordeum vulgare)DroughtPhytohormoneProteomeStrigolactoneTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID37735356
PMCPMC10515045
OpenAlexW4386944211

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.