ArticlePLoS computational biology2023
Likelihood-ratio test statistic for the finite-sample case in nonlinear ordinary differential equation models.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- PEtab Select: Specification standard and supporting software for automated model selection.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Quantitative modelling of P-TEFb mediated CTD phosphorylation identifies local cooperativity.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Data-driven model reveals increased stability of CAG-expanded huntingtin RNA due to MID1 binding.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Exploring the threshold relationship between PTH level and P1NP level in patients with osteoporotic fractures: a retrospective cross-sectional study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Conditional universal differential equations capture population dynamics and interindividual variation in c-peptide production.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2025Article
- Screening of glioma susceptibility SNPs and construction of risk models based on machine learning algorithms.BMC neurology · 2025Article
- Pesticide exposure and cardiovascular health in non-CVD mortality population: novel evidence from NHANES 2007-2018 using Life's Essential 8.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Efficient parameter estimation for ODE models of cellular processes using semi-quantitative data.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Antibody detection against Kunitz-type protein inInternational journal of veterinary science and medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Likelihood ratios are frequently utilized as basis for statistical tests, for model selection criteria and for assessing parameter and prediction uncertainties, e.g. using the profile likelihood. However, translating these likelihood ratios into p-values or confidence intervals requires the exact form of the test statistic's distribution. The lack of knowledge about this distribution for nonlinear ordinary differential equation (ODE) models requires an approximation which assumes the so-called asymptotic setting, i.e. a sufficiently large amount of data. Since the amount of data from quantitative molecular biology is typically limited in applications, this finite-sample case regularly occurs for mechanistic models of dynamical systems, e.g. biochemical reaction networks or infectious disease models. Thus, it is unclear whether the standard approach of using statistical thresholds derived for the asymptotic large-sample setting in realistic applications results in valid conclusions. In this study, empirical likelihood ratios for parameters from 19 published nonlinear ODE benchmark models are investigated using a resampling approach for the original data designs. Their distributions are compared to the asymptotic approximation and statistical thresholds are checked for conservativeness. It turns out, that corrections of the likelihood ratios in such finite-sample applications are required in order to avoid anti-conservative results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.